From: Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: questions on calc_delta_mine() in sched.c
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 15:30:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <481B79EF.3090200@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209730442.6508.3.camel@lappy>
>> if (unlikely(!lw->inv_weight))
>> lw->inv_weight = (WMULT_CONST-lw->weight/2) / (lw->weight+1);
>>
>>
>> Q1) This code is hit often in scenarios I run, is this really unlikely for
>> others?
>
> I think it became a lot more likely recently, perhaps removing that
> unlikely is not such a bad idea.
Especially if you remove the divide in the other locations, then this might
even be likely.
>
>> Q2) The rest of the code in sched.c seems to make inv_weight ==
>> WMULT_CONST/weight and I was wondering if you could explain why this
>> instance is different.
>
> because the rest of the code is wrong, there are only 2 other sites, and
> I have a patch that removes those div64_64() with =0;
>
> The idea is to use rounding division: (x + y/2) / y
> but we can't because 'x' is touching the limits of our modulo space,
> hence we do: (x - y/2) / y
> which comes in 1 short, that fixup has been lost along the way.
Ah, that makes more sense, and the fact that it is broken explains why I
couldn't figure it out.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-02 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-01 20:45 questions on calc_delta_mine() in sched.c Joel Schopp
2008-05-02 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-02 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-02 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-02 18:46 ` Joel Schopp
2008-05-02 18:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-02 20:30 ` Joel Schopp [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=481B79EF.3090200@austin.ibm.com \
--to=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox