public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: "Moore\, Eric" <Eric.Moore@lsi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HELP:  Is writeq an atomic operation??
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 17:42:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <481BB512.6030101@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ada63tw494z.fsf@cisco.com>

Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > Is a 64bit write to MMIO registers an atomic operation when using the
>  > writeq API?  
>  > 
>  > My concern is when I send 64bit data via writeq, will it be sent out as
>  > two 32 bit writes?  If so, is it possible that another CPU be sending
>  > the data at the same time.  Meaning can I write the 1st 32bit data from
>  > CPU-A, meanwhile CPU-B is writing his 32bit data at the same time, and
>  > CPU-A didn't complete the full 64bit in one shot.  If this could occur,
>  > is there an API that I can use to make sure the entire data sent in one
>  > atomic operation?
> 
> I don't have an authoritative answer, but I can say that I coded
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca and .../mlx4 assuming that writeq() is
> atomic in the sense that you say, and no one has reported any problems.
> 

If you're not under lock you're screwed on a 32-bit platform.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-03  0:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-02 22:40 HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation?? Moore, Eric
2008-05-02 22:46 ` Roland Dreier
2008-05-03  0:42   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-05-03 14:35     ` Alan Cox
2008-05-03 17:40       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-03 22:37   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-04 17:01     ` Roland Dreier
2008-05-02 22:50 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-02 23:03   ` Moore, Eric
2008-05-02 23:13     ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-02 23:04 ` Roland Dreier
2008-05-02 23:20   ` Moore, Eric
2008-05-03  0:10     ` Roland Dreier
2008-05-02 23:12 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-05-03  0:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found] <0631C836DBF79F42B5A60C8C8D4E822901047B1D@NAMAIL2.ad.lsil.com>
2008-05-02 22:32 ` David Miller
2008-05-02 22:43   ` Roland Dreier
2008-05-02 22:49     ` David Miller
2008-05-02 22:49     ` Moore, Eric
2008-05-02 22:53       ` Roland Dreier
2008-05-02 23:13         ` Moore, Eric
2008-05-02 23:21           ` Roland Dreier
2008-05-02 23:31             ` Moore, Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=481BB512.6030101@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=Eric.Moore@lsi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox