From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762138AbYECJ3x (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 05:29:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758770AbYECJ3q (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 05:29:46 -0400 Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.28]:59960 "EHLO smtp2-g19.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758749AbYECJ3p (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 05:29:45 -0400 Message-ID: <481C3087.8020501@free.fr> Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 11:29:43 +0200 From: matthieu castet User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 Iceape/1.1.9 (Debian-1.1.9-3) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel list , Linus Torvalds , joern@logfs.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: LogFS merge Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Jörn Engel wrote: > not being familiar with either maintaining my own git tree or the -next > process, I'd still like to get logfs into mainline. It has gone through > six rounds of reviews and the last has been mostly about crossing some > i's here and dotting some t's there. > > So should it simmer in -next and -mm for another month? Should it go > straight into -linus? Shouldn't this get review by mtd guys first ? Also for info, there have been some issue raised by the ubifs developer [1]. Matthieu [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/658740/focus=660392