From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757113AbYEEFFn (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 01:05:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753231AbYEEFFd (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 01:05:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:37805 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752057AbYEEFFc (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2008 01:05:32 -0400 Message-ID: <481E94EE.2060800@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 22:02:38 -0700 From: Ulrich Drepper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Davide Libenzi CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] flag parameters: helper function References: <200805050342.m453gkY4029814@devserv.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Davide Libenzi wrote: > I dunno if this deserves separate c/h files. Otherwise ... I used separate files because all of the users are in optional code. I would have had to stuff the code in a completely unrelated file which I think isn't clean. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkgelO4ACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHSVQgCffwvlbMeZTI5N19+J13VS8+ng 8/0AoI8wwTtrAwbFIbuu9e4RrvEIzWGC =2gim -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----