From: Peter Oberparleiter <peter.oberparleiter@de.ibm.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
ltp-coverage@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] kbuild: convert include and source paths
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 19:03:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48208F4F.1030405@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080505195815.GD8868@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 05:24:26PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
>> From: Peter Oberparleiter <peter.oberparleiter@de.ibm.com>
>>
>> Modify kbuild to convert relative include and source paths to absolute
>> form. Also change the module versioning mechanism to alter object file
>> names only after compiling.
>>
>> Required by the gcov profiling infrastructure: source paths are
>> referenced by the compiled object files. Using relative paths or
>> object file names which are different from the source name would
>> prevent the gcov tool from finding the corresponding source files.
>
> For the relative path issue do you really fix this at the right place?
> I would say that teaching gcov tool from where to look would be better.
Actually it is gcc that would need to be changed to only include
absolute paths in compiled object files. While I haven't led that
particular discussion with gcc developers yet, I could imagine that they
would argue that such an option already exists: by specifying only
absolute paths during compilation. Also, any dependency on a future
version of gcc would, in my opinion, greatly reduce the overall
usefulness of this gcov kernel infrastructure.
Would it be acceptable to isolate these changes to kbuild by
if-statements, i.e. use absolute paths only of CONFIG_GCOV is
specified (as Jan Engelhardt suggested)?
>> Also change the module versioning mechanism to alter object file
>> names only after compiling.
> Can I get this as a separate patch please.
> It may be general useful and makes sense to look at alone.
Ok, I will do that.
Regards,
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-06 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-05 15:24 [RFC PATCH 3/6] kbuild: convert include and source paths Peter Oberparleiter
2008-05-05 19:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-06 17:03 ` Peter Oberparleiter [this message]
2008-05-06 4:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 17:28 ` Peter Oberparleiter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48208F4F.1030405@de.ibm.com \
--to=peter.oberparleiter@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp-coverage@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox