From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754588AbYEGWax@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754588AbYEGWax (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 7 May 2008 18:30:53 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932953AbYEGW3S
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 7 May 2008 18:29:18 -0400
Received: from smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl ([213.51.130.200]:40069 "EHLO
	smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933098AbYEGW3O (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 7 May 2008 18:29:14 -0400
Message-ID: <48222D71.8070602@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 00:30:09 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, hpa@zytor.com,
       torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.26, PAT and AMD family 6
References: <48210A71.1060409@keyaccess.nl>	 <86802c440805061939q39ff5500h3c9e229ecbc6b2e6@mail.gmail.com>	 <20080507124650.GD29935@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>	 <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805072122270.3318@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>	 <20080507212343.GB14951@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>	 <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805072341210.3318@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>	 <20080507221435.GH18516@elf.ucw.cz> <86802c440805071526s53c4542co6d08704d0364147@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <86802c440805071526s53c4542co6d08704d0364147@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 08-05-08 00:26, Yinghai Lu wrote:

>>  1) it has empty changelog (come on, "review" a patch and not notice
>>  that changelog is empty?!)
> 
> the title is good enough

And this thread proves it. No, the title wasn't good enough.

Rene.