From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
menage@google.com, seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
oleg@tv-sign.ru, rostedt@goodmis.org, rientjes@google.com
Subject: Re: Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 10:56:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48233EEB.1010807@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210142681.13978.166.camel@twins>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 22:52 -0500, Paul Jackson wrote:
>> Andrew wrote:
>>> Don't worry about it. I sorted out things locally and I expect that
>>> Stephen will be able to as well.
>> Ok ...
>>
>> I hesitate more than I should some times to NAQ patches,
>> but the more I think about this one, the less willing I
>> am to have a per-cpuset file called "system".
>>
>> I'm not sure what "sorted out" means ... I'll wait and see.
>>
>> Thanks, Andrew.
>>
>> Sorry, Max, Peter and Ingo ... we really had not arrived at
>> agreement on this one.
>
> No problem, I've been meaning to redo this whole series but somehow
> stuff got in the way and I never got around to it :-/
I'm actually totally surprised that it got in. Ingo applied Peter's initial
patch to his sched-devel tree but then ignored follow up patches with fixes
and stuff from me (I'm assuming that was because we started discussion
alternative options).
Anyway, my vote goes for reverting these series.
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-08 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-07 1:08 [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file Paul Menage
2008-05-07 1:21 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-07 1:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:40 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 3:38 ` Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch (was: Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file) Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 3:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 3:52 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 6:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-08 17:56 ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
2008-05-09 10:22 ` Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 11:26 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-21 0:46 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-05-07 1:38 ` [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:41 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 9:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-07 15:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:46 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-07 1:49 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 1:51 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 1:58 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 2:11 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:15 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 2:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 2:32 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:12 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-07 2:17 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:27 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48233EEB.1010807@qualcomm.com \
--to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox