From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758926AbYEIPBZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2008 11:01:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754338AbYEIPAx (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2008 11:00:53 -0400 Received: from charybdis-ext.suse.de ([195.135.221.2]:38206 "EHLO emea5-mh.id5.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753991AbYEIPAu (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2008 11:00:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4824673B.1030503@suse.de> Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 19:01:15 +0400 From: Alexey Starikovskiy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: James Bottomley , WANG Cong , toralf.foerster@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Mike Travis Subject: Re: build issue #380 for v2.6.26-rc1-279-g28a4acb : mach-voyager: multiple definition of `phys_cpu_present_map' References: <200805091114.00244.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> <20080509095244.GJ2543@hacking> <20080509095837.GB19617@elte.hu> <1210342946.3069.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080509144722.GA20566@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080509144722.GA20566@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * James Bottomley wrote: > >>>> /* Bitmask of CPUs present in the system - exported by i386_syms.c, used >>>> * by scheduler but indexed physically */ >>>> -cpumask_t phys_cpu_present_map = CPU_MASK_NONE; >>>> +static cpumask_t phys_cpu_present_map = CPU_MASK_NONE; >>> i've got the one below queued up but it's stalled as it could easily be >>> wrong and there's no ack from James yet and there's been discussion back >>> and forth. James, what do you suggest? > >> I already told you that this was incorrect. This is what I sent as >> the replacement on 28 April and I didn't hear back from you. >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120941111400620 > > ok - picked it up for testing - could you please send a signoff line as > well? > > Alexey, you moved those SMP variables, do you agree with the patch from > James? (it looks good to me) Yes, they look good to me as well. Alex.