From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /proc/kallsyms broken in 2.6.26-rc1-git6
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 01:16:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4824DB36.8000500@firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4824AD3C.3070506@grupopie.com>
> That's not for me to judge, but I believe it has always been like that.
No, normally /proc/kallsyms looks similar to System.tap. Where are all
these DW.* symbols coming from? They didn't use to be there and don't
make any sense because they don't have any valid kernel addresses.
> I just wanted to understand if you noticed a change in behavior (which
> is probably a bug) or if it has always been like that but you just
> noticed how ugly it is.
I noticed a change in behavior.
> Maybe you also have some debug or markers configuration or something
> that is generating extra symbols to a special section that is just
> making the problem look worse now.
Nothing particular. I uploaded the config at
http://halobates.de/basil-config
> Anyway, I can change the way kallsyms works, but that has to be done
> with some care because there are some userspace tools that read
> /proc/kallsyms and we don't want to break those. A proper testing period
> through -mm should take care of that, though.
It's the other way round -- kallsyms changed and that change will likely
break programs.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-09 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-09 17:41 /proc/kallsyms broken in 2.6.26-rc1-git6 Andi Kleen
2008-05-09 18:03 ` Paulo Marques
2008-05-09 19:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-09 19:59 ` Paulo Marques
2008-05-09 23:16 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-05-12 9:55 ` Paulo Marques
2008-05-12 10:08 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-09 23:37 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-12 10:00 ` Paulo Marques
2008-05-12 15:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-12 17:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-12 17:28 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-13 9:54 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-19 18:11 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-19 18:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-05-19 18:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-19 18:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4824DB36.8000500@firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox