From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757058AbYEKOE0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 10:04:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754766AbYEKOES (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 10:04:18 -0400 Received: from smtp1.wifiinternet.cz ([89.31.47.1]:64005 "EHLO bor.wifiinternet.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752962AbYEKOER (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 10:04:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4826FD34.5030009@seznam.cz> Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 16:05:40 +0200 From: Michal Simek Reply-To: monstr@seznam.cz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Williams , Stephen Neuendorffer , John Linn , Linux Kernel list , Arnd Bergmann , microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, Grant Likely Subject: Microblaze toolchain - libc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi John W, is it any movement in libc? I would like clear code around syscalls. Thanks for info, Michal