From: Geoff Levand <geoffrey.levand@am.sony.com>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org,
Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] [PPC] provide walk_memory_resource() for ppc
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:17:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4828DDFE.6050805@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1206664795.19368.13.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>
Hi,
I've had some trouble with this change.
Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Provide walk_memory_resource() for ppc64. PPC maintains
> logic memory region mapping in lmb.memory structures. Walk
> through these structures and do the callbacks for the
> contiguous chunks.
...
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc3.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c 2008-03-05 10:14:28.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc3/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c 2008-03-05 10:32:16.000000000 -0800
> @@ -148,19 +148,35 @@ out:
>
> /*
> * walk_memory_resource() needs to make sure there is no holes in a given
> - * memory range. On PPC64, since this range comes from /sysfs, the range
> - * is guaranteed to be valid, non-overlapping and can not contain any
> - * holes. By the time we get here (memory add or remove), /proc/device-tree
> - * is updated and correct. Only reason we need to check against device-tree
> - * would be if we allow user-land to specify a memory range through a
> - * system call/ioctl etc. instead of doing offline/online through /sysfs.
> + * memory range. PPC64 does not maintain the memory layout in /proc/iomem.
> + * Instead it maintains it in lmb.memory structures. Walk through the
> + * memory regions, find holes and callback for contiguous regions.
> */
> int
> walk_memory_resource(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, void *arg,
> int (*func)(unsigned long, unsigned long, void *))
> {
> - return (*func)(start_pfn, nr_pages, arg);
> + struct lmb_property res;
> + unsigned long pfn, len;
> + u64 end;
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + res.base = (u64) start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + res.size = (u64) nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + end = res.base + res.size - 1;
> + while ((res.base < end) && (lmb_find(&res) >= 0)) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
In the PS3 platform code (arch/pwerpc/platfroms/ps3/mm.c) the hotplug
memory is added like this:
...
result = add_memory(0, start_addr, map.r1.size);
...
result = online_pages(start_pfn, nr_pages);
...
In its work, online_pages() eventually calls walk_memory_resource(),
which has been changed as above to do a test on lmb_find(). I found
that this lmb_find() test always fails for PS3 since add_memory()
does not call lmb_add().
Is it the responsibility of the platform code to call lmb_add(), or
should that be done by add_memory()?
-Geoff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-28 0:33 [PATCH 0/5] 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 hotplug memory remove updates Badari Pulavarty
2008-03-28 0:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] generic __remove_pages() support Badari Pulavarty
2008-03-28 2:26 ` Yasunori Goto
2008-03-28 0:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] [PPC] htab_remove_mapping() error handling Badari Pulavarty
2008-03-28 0:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] [PPC] hotplug memory notifications for ppc Badari Pulavarty
2008-03-28 0:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] [PPC] update lmb for hotplug memory add/remove Badari Pulavarty
2008-03-28 2:40 ` Kumar Gala
2008-03-28 16:52 ` Badari Pulavarty
2008-05-15 6:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-03-28 0:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] [PPC] provide walk_memory_resource() for ppc Badari Pulavarty
2008-05-13 0:17 ` Geoff Levand [this message]
2008-05-13 15:09 ` Badari Pulavarty
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-06 18:54 [PATCH 0/5] 2.6.25-rc3-mm1 hotplug memory remove updates Badari Pulavarty
2008-03-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] [PPC] provide walk_memory_resource() for ppc Badari Pulavarty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4828DDFE.6050805@am.sony.com \
--to=geoffrey.levand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox