From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@unixsol.org>
To: Donald Douwsma <donaldd@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
cluster-devel@redhat.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:30:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482951C3.60600@unixsol.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48292742.8090409@sgi.com>
Donald Douwsma mumbled something about, On 5/13/08 8:29 AM:
> Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
>> Hi guys, I know that not all kernel thread users are converted to
>> start only when needed but the following is little annoying specially
>> when I'm not even using jfs, xfs and gfs2.
>>
>> Look at the ps output from a standard distro 2.6.24.5 kernel after a
>> fresh boot:
> ...
>
>> Kernel config can be found here:
>>
>> http://mirrors.unixsol.org/slackware/slackware-12.1/kernels/hugesmp.s/config
>
> Your distro is building all of these modules into the kernel.
> CONFIG_XFS_FS=y
> CONFIG_JFS_FS=y
> CONFIG_GFS2_FS=y
>
> This isnt exactly standard practice, normally they'd be set to =m and only
> used if required to mount a filesystem. You may want to ask the slackware
> people why they chose to do this for their hugexxx.s kernels.
I know that they are compiled in the kernel, but since they
are not used isn't starting their own kthreads kind of
unnecessary? Surely the threads can be started on demand
only when xfs/etc volume is mounted.
--
Georgi Chorbadzhiyski
http://georgi.unixsol.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-12 22:55 Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2) Georgi Chorbadzhiyski
2008-05-12 23:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-13 8:36 ` Georgi Chorbadzhiyski
2008-05-14 17:22 ` Stefan Richter
2008-05-13 5:29 ` Donald Douwsma
2008-05-13 5:51 ` FD Cami
2008-05-13 8:33 ` Georgi Chorbadzhiyski
2008-05-13 8:30 ` Georgi Chorbadzhiyski [this message]
2008-05-13 9:03 ` David Chinner
2008-05-13 9:21 ` [Jfs-discussion] " Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-13 9:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-13 15:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-05-13 13:31 ` Lennart Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482951C3.60600@unixsol.org \
--to=gf@unixsol.org \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=donaldd@sgi.com \
--cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox