From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759253AbYEMIgS (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 04:36:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757281AbYEMIgF (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 04:36:05 -0400 Received: from ns.unixsol.org ([193.110.159.2]:32938 "EHLO ns.unixsol.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755985AbYEMIgF (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 04:36:05 -0400 Message-ID: <482952F2.3080608@unixsol.org> Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:36:02 +0300 From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski Organization: Unix Solutions Ltd. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Engelhardt CC: xfs@oss.sgi.com, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Unneeded kernel threads (xfs, jfs, gfs2) References: <4828CAC6.3090402@unixsol.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jan Engelhardt mumbled something about, On 5/13/08 2:21 AM: > On Tuesday 2008-05-13 00:55, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote: >> Not needed here, because no jfs partition is in use. >> Not needed here, because no xfs partition is in use. >> I dont use gfs2 > > You miss the best of Linux. So, why not unload the modules? ext3 is working just fine for now, thanks (: >>> 1141 ? S< 0:00 \_ [block-osm/1] >> What is osm? Can't find anything in kernel config? > > drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c:#define OSM_NAME "block-osm" > >>> 1148 ? S< 0:00 \_ [khpsbpkt] >> What is this? > > ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c:static struct task_struct *khpsbpkt_thread; Strange names :) -- Georgi Chorbadzhiyski http://georgi.unixsol.org/