From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Gianni Tedesco <gxt@cs.nott.ac.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
arges@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: oprofile BUG() in current kernel.
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 12:25:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48296C96.8060000@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210671688.3472.10.camel@dao.KWGR614>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1048 bytes --]
Gianni Tedesco a écrit :
>
>
> Nope, exact same bad paging request in kernel mode... probably the bug
> is something deep in oprofile then?
>
Hum... Are you using oprofile as a module or statically included in kernel ?
Current module loader only allocates percpu room by examining
".data.percpu" section and should be augmented to also look at
".data.percpu.shared_aligned"
Or, change DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED() for modules (to use
".data.percpu" only)
Anyway, with the per_cpu conversion of cpu_buffer, we dont need to
request cache_line alignment anymore
[PATCH] oprofile: Dont request cache line alignment for cpu_buffer
Alignment was previously requested because cpu_buffer was an [NR_CPUS]
array, to avoid cache line sharing between CPUS.
After commit 608dfddd845da5ab6accef70154c8910529699f7 (
oprofile: change cpu_buffer from array to per_cpu variable ),
we dont need to force an alignement anymore since cpu_buffer sits in
per_cpu zone.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
[-- Attachment #2: oprofile.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 822 bytes --]
diff --git a/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c b/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c
index efcbf4b..2450b3a 100644
--- a/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
#include "buffer_sync.h"
#include "oprof.h"
-DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer, cpu_buffer);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer, cpu_buffer);
static void wq_sync_buffer(struct work_struct *work);
diff --git a/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.h b/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.h
index 1358817..c3e366b 100644
--- a/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.h
+++ b/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.h
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct oprofile_cpu_buffer {
unsigned long sample_invalid_eip;
int cpu;
struct delayed_work work;
-} ____cacheline_aligned;
+};
DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer, cpu_buffer);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-12 12:02 oprofile BUG() in current kernel Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-12 12:19 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-12 13:31 ` Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-12 14:11 ` Maynard Johnson
2008-05-12 16:38 ` Chris J Arges
2008-05-13 8:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-13 9:01 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-13 9:41 ` Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-13 10:25 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2008-05-13 10:59 ` Gianni Tedesco
[not found] ` <482986B3.1090601@cosmosbay.com>
2008-05-13 14:38 ` Gianni Tedesco
2008-05-13 15:23 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-13 15:12 ` [PATCH] per_cpu: fix DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED for modules Eric Dumazet
2008-05-14 5:18 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48296C96.8060000@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arges@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gxt@cs.nott.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox