From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Andreas Herrmann" <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
"\"S.Çağlar Onur\"" <caglar@pardus.org.tr>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, "Matt Mackall" <mpm@selenic.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] Lots of "rescheduling IPIs" in powertop
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 23:19:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482A05F3.7020408@firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0805131409w2914fbedgb608c7b87c234e2e@mail.gmail.com>
> The desktop is a P4:
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 15
> model : 6
> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
> stepping : 5
> cpu MHz : 2992.624
> cache size : 2048 KB
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx
> lm constant_tsc pebs bts pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cid cx16 xtpr
> lahf_lm
> bogomips : 5990.81
> clflush size : 64
>
> (similar for processor 1)
>
> # msr
> 0
Ok the CPU reports it doesn't support any C states in MWAIT. If that is
correct then it would be correct to not use MWAIT idle and might
actually save more power to not use it.
I don't know if that's true or not. Do you have a power meter perhaps?
If yes can you measure if there's a difference between mwait=idle /
default on your box when it is idle?
[cc Arjan he might now if that CPU is supposed to support C1 in MWAIT]
>
> The laptop is a Pentium Dual-Core:
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 6
> model : 15
> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T2310 @ 1.46GHz
> stepping : 13
> cpu MHz : 800.000
> cache size : 1024 KB
...
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca
> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm
> constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 ssse3
> cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
> bogomips : 2930.23
> clflush size : 64
>
> (similar for processor 1)
>
> # ./msr
> 1110
CPU reports it supports C1/C2/C3. Are you sure there is a difference on
that box? The code should have kept using MWAIT because it checks C1.
Please double check.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-13 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-13 20:42 [BISECTED] Lots of "rescheduling IPIs" in powertop Vegard Nossum
2008-05-13 20:54 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-13 21:09 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-13 21:19 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-05-14 4:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-14 6:58 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 13:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-14 15:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-14 6:00 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-14 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-14 7:11 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-14 9:09 ` Andreas Herrmann
2008-05-14 11:42 ` Andi Kleen
2008-05-15 16:10 ` Andreas Herrmann
2008-05-16 8:40 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482A05F3.7020408@firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=caglar@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox