The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Seger <Mark.Seger@hp.com>
To: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	Chris Sturtivant <csturtiv@sgi.com>, Tony Ernst <tee@sgi.com>,
	Guillaume Thouvenin <guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net>,
	Jay Lan <jlan@engr.sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: taskstats and /proc/.../io asymmetry?
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 06:59:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <482AC60D.8020207@hp.com> (raw)

If you look at /proc/pid/stat, you can get the total CPU consumed by a 
process.  If you look at /proc/pid/task/tid/stat you can get the cpu 
consumed by a thread and if the tid is that of the parent you only gets 
its consumption as opposed to all its children.

I was surprised to see that the way process I/O is reported doesn't 
follow this model.  There are no /prod/pid/task/tid/io entries but 
rather you need to look in /proc/tid/io.  While I view this as a minor 
inconvenience, I can certainly live with it.  However, /proc/pid/io does 
not show the aggregate I/O numbers for the whole process and that both 
surprises and disappoints.  This means if I have a process that starts a 
bunch of worker threads that do the real work and I want to find the top 
I/O consumers I can't simply walk the /proc/pid tree but rather have to 
look at all the threads of each process and add them up.

Or am I missing something?

-mark



             reply	other threads:[~2008-05-14 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-14 10:59 Mark Seger [this message]
2008-05-16  3:49 ` taskstats and /proc/.../io asymmetry? Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=482AC60D.8020207@hp.com \
    --to=mark.seger@hp.com \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=csturtiv@sgi.com \
    --cc=guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=jlan@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=tee@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox