From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/10] Bsdacct: turn the acct_lock from on-the-struct to global
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 15:04:36 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482C18C4.5000900@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <482C15FE.7070300@openvz.org>
Don't use per-bsd-acct-struct lock, but work with a global one.
This lock is taken for short periods, so it doesn't seem it'll
become a bottleneck, but it will allow us to easily avoid many
locking difficulties in the future.
So this is a mostly s/acct_globals.lock/acct_lock/ over the file.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
---
kernel/acct.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/acct.c b/kernel/acct.c
index 05f8bc0..fc71c13 100644
--- a/kernel/acct.c
+++ b/kernel/acct.c
@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ static void do_acct_process(struct pid_namespace *ns, struct file *);
* the cache line to have the data after getting the lock.
*/
struct bsd_acct_struct {
- spinlock_t lock;
volatile int active;
volatile int needcheck;
struct file *file;
@@ -91,8 +90,9 @@ struct bsd_acct_struct {
struct timer_list timer;
};
-static struct bsd_acct_struct acct_globals __cacheline_aligned =
- {__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(acct_globals.lock)};
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(acct_lock);
+
+static struct bsd_acct_struct acct_globals __cacheline_aligned;
/*
* Called whenever the timer says to check the free space.
@@ -114,11 +114,11 @@ static int check_free_space(struct file *file)
sector_t resume;
sector_t suspend;
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
res = acct_globals.active;
if (!file || !acct_globals.needcheck)
goto out;
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
/* May block */
if (vfs_statfs(file->f_path.dentry, &sbuf))
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int check_free_space(struct file *file)
* If some joker switched acct_globals.file under us we'ld better be
* silent and _not_ touch anything.
*/
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
if (file != acct_globals.file) {
if (act)
res = act>0;
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int check_free_space(struct file *file)
add_timer(&acct_globals.timer);
res = acct_globals.active;
out:
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
return res;
}
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ out:
* Close the old accounting file (if currently open) and then replace
* it with file (if non-NULL).
*
- * NOTE: acct_globals.lock MUST be held on entry and exit.
+ * NOTE: acct_lock MUST be held on entry and exit.
*/
static void acct_file_reopen(struct file *file)
{
@@ -201,11 +201,11 @@ static void acct_file_reopen(struct file *file)
}
if (old_acct) {
mnt_unpin(old_acct->f_path.mnt);
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
do_acct_process(old_ns, old_acct);
filp_close(old_acct, NULL);
put_pid_ns(old_ns);
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
}
}
@@ -235,10 +235,10 @@ static int acct_on(char *name)
return error;
}
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
mnt_pin(file->f_path.mnt);
acct_file_reopen(file);
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
mntput(file->f_path.mnt); /* it's pinned, now give up active reference */
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_acct(const char __user *name)
} else {
error = security_acct(NULL);
if (!error) {
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
acct_file_reopen(NULL);
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
}
}
return error;
@@ -289,10 +289,10 @@ asmlinkage long sys_acct(const char __user *name)
*/
void acct_auto_close_mnt(struct vfsmount *m)
{
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
if (acct_globals.file && acct_globals.file->f_path.mnt == m)
acct_file_reopen(NULL);
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
}
/**
@@ -304,12 +304,12 @@ void acct_auto_close_mnt(struct vfsmount *m)
*/
void acct_auto_close(struct super_block *sb)
{
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
if (acct_globals.file &&
acct_globals.file->f_path.mnt->mnt_sb == sb) {
acct_file_reopen(NULL);
}
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
}
/*
@@ -594,15 +594,15 @@ void acct_process(void)
if (!acct_globals.file)
return;
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
file = acct_globals.file;
if (unlikely(!file)) {
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
return;
}
get_file(file);
ns = get_pid_ns(acct_globals.ns);
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
do_acct_process(ns, file);
fput(file);
--
1.5.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-15 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-15 10:52 [PATCH 0/10] Make bsd process accounting work in pid namespaces Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/10] Bsdacct: rename acct_blbls to bsd_acct_struct Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/10] Pidns: use kzalloc when allocating new pid_namespace struct Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 10:58 ` [PATCH 3/10] Pidns: add the struct bsd_acct_struct pointer on " Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:00 ` [PATCH 4/10] Bsdacct: "truthify" a comment near acct_process Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:02 ` [PATCH 5/10] Bsdacct: make check timer accept a bsd_acct_struct argument Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:04 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2008-05-15 11:07 ` [PATCH 7/10] Bsdacct: make internal code work with passed bsd_acct_struct, not global Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:08 ` [PATCH 8/10] Bsdacct: switch from global bsd_acct_struct instance to per-pidns one Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:10 ` [PATCH 9/10] Bsdacct: turn acct off for all pidns-s on umount time Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] Bsdacct: account dying tasks in all relevant namespaces Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-16 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-16 10:11 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-16 10:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-16 2:43 ` [PATCH 0/10] Make bsd process accounting work in pid namespaces Andrew Morton
2008-05-16 10:16 ` Pavel Emelyanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482C18C4.5000900@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox