From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1764905AbYEOUQk@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1764905AbYEOUQk (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 15 May 2008 16:16:40 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755519AbYEOUQX
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 15 May 2008 16:16:23 -0400
Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:44416 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755517AbYEOUQW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 15 May 2008 16:16:22 -0400
Message-ID: <482C9A0E.3020305@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 16:16:14 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Peterson <cpeterso@cpeterso.com>
CC: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>,
       "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
       Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of
 IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0805150009060.18303@ikari.dreamhost.com>	 <20080515142154.0595e475@core>	 <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52052D71BB@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>	 <482C7B18.6060003@garzik.org> <482C7E53.3050300@hp.com>	 <482C8184.2030906@garzik.org> <482C8550.5000909@intel.com>	 <482C8D4D.3040702@garzik.org> <a24804730805151301s3c6644d0hc2c78b8008fe035d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a24804730805151301s3c6644d0hc2c78b8008fe035d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----)
X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.4 on srv5.dvmed.net summary:
	Content analysis details:   (-4.4 points, 5.0 required)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Chris Peterson wrote:
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but this thread's conclusions seem to be:
> 
> * network interrupts are an inappropriate source of entropy (see my patch)
> * headless servers need entropy, but should seek a better solution,
> such as EGD, hardware RNG, or other kernel entropy sources (but that
> is a separate task)
> * TPM RNG is a separate task and, if implemented, should be in
> drivers/char/hw_random/

That's my own opinion, yes.  But not necessarily a consensus opinion :)

	Jeff