From: "Stéphane ANCELOT" <sancelot@free.fr>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: detecting kernel mem leak
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:58:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482D4CC8.2050501@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805151036030.18708@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Tue, 13 May 2008, Stéphane ANCELOT wrote:
>
>
>> I kept my kernel running with few applications for 5 days , doing
>> nothing more than backing up few kb of data on disk and refresh few X apps.
>>
>> Ater five days the global memory available go down from 24Mb to 8Mb ...
>>
>
> That is normal. Linux tries to put all memory to use and will free on
> demand.
>
>
>> The are some signifiant changes in slabinfo but now, I do not know where
>> to search ?
>>
>
> Compile the slabinfo tool.
>
> gcc -o slabinfo linux/Documentation/vm/slabinfo.c
>
> Then you can do
>
> slabinfo -T
>
> to get an overview of how much is used by slabs. But I do not see that
> slabs are using an excessive amount. So toying around with slabinfo is
> not going to get you anywhere.
>
>
1) slabinfo tells me SYSFS support for SLUB not active
In the kernel, there is SLAB or SLUB , my kernel is at this time
configured for SLAB allocator.
it is documented SLUB minimizes cache line usage.
Do you think I have to switch to SLUB ?
2) regarding memory debugging, your reply and some mesages told it was
normal the memory was growing (with ext3 buffer_heads...) and released
on demand.
This sounds to me it becomes VERY VERY difficult telling if my system
is STABLE or NOT. Is there a way to bypass it ?
I assume I have to do some kind of small program trying to allocate
almost the full remaining memory available at startup to empty caches ?
Best Regards
Steph
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-16 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 9:41 detecting kernel mem leak sancelot
2008-04-29 12:46 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-29 16:58 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <4821C526.8030901@free.fr>
2008-05-07 17:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-13 8:50 ` Stéphane ANCELOT
2008-05-13 19:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-15 10:58 ` Stéphane ANCELOT
2008-05-15 17:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-16 8:58 ` Stéphane ANCELOT [this message]
2008-05-16 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-13 10:26 Tomasz Chmielewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482D4CC8.2050501@free.fr \
--to=sancelot@free.fr \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox