From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760639AbYESSEe (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 14:04:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753624AbYESSE0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 14:04:26 -0400 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:60635 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753398AbYESSE0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 14:04:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4831C124.2060905@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 11:04:20 -0700 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: Eric Dumazet , Rusty Russell , Andrew Morton , linux kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting References: <482C9FC5.2070508@cosmosbay.com> <482D1BCE.3060501@cosmosbay.com> <482D8EFC.8040109@sgi.com> <200805171533.46295.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <482E8AF5.9050804@cosmosbay.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Sat, 17 May 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> Thats a lot of work and apparently Mike and Christoph are doing it. > > Indeed. Thanks for the support. I hope Mike gets the stuff out soon. I > know he was working on one issue that cause the zero based stuff to break. > Maybe it would help if he would post what he has so far? I'm re-basing it on the x86/latest tree as sched/latest was failing my tests last week on both the AMD and Intel boxes. As soon as I re-verify everything I'll send it in. Thanks, Mike