From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761666AbYEST7h (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 15:59:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758673AbYEST70 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 15:59:26 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.181]:2465 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756717AbYEST7Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 15:59:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nEHvlHmzgZLgOi8lj6jvpgdesTpbPfH8DjrLWQ+5Lq6auMI2b0haW0avAUKsE7JxS7muwYqSMFci2L/93SPt3wnQjWY9daSULViIdQWkcsSoPmM5YdPAdjwFOrPfMrsciv637vA5IrMRqblhVVbY4a6wIVv1doMb4OXBbapheO0= Message-ID: <4831DBDC.8000008@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 15:58:20 -0400 From: Gregory Haskins Reply-To: gregory.haskins@gmail.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rune Torgersen CC: Scott Wood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Oops with PREEMPT-RT on 2.6.25.4 References: <4831D527.2020907@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rune Torgersen wrote: > Scott Wood wrote: > >> You're recursively entering lock_timer_base, which does a >> spin_lock_irqsave(). Either interrupts are enabled when they should >> not be, or an interrupt was supposed to be threaded that isn't. > > Sort of figured. How do I figure out which one, and how to fix it? > I've never gotten any -rt patchsets to work on this CPU, and it always > seems to be related to the disk driver. > I've tried since 2.6.16 ppc.... (2.6.16, 2.6.18 on ppc, 2.6.24 and 25 on > powerpc) > > Even though this is a custom board, I'm pretty sure I can get it to fail > on a pq2fads board with the same disk controller. Im not sure if LOCKDEP is available for that architecture. Have you tried it? Its pretty good at flushing these kinds of issues out (assuming its available). -Greg