From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932398AbYETOrs (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 10:47:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765911AbYETOrk (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 10:47:40 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:36648 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765725AbYETOrk (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 10:47:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4832E461.2070503@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 07:46:57 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Jones CC: Linux Kernel , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [X86] Remove unnecessary code in 64bit CPU identification. References: <200805200409.m4K49ZuE024343@gelk.kernelslacker.org> In-Reply-To: <200805200409.m4K49ZuE024343@gelk.kernelslacker.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dave Jones wrote: > There were no 64bit Transmeta CPUs made (and it'd be something of > a surprise if they started any time soon). To the best of my knowledge, > no CPU vendor cloned the 80860000 cpuid space claimed by Transmeta. > By removing this code, we can also eliminate calling cpuid 0x80000007 twice. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones I'd really like to avoid divergences between the 32-bit and 64-bit code if they can be avoided at this point. These codes need to be unified, not further split. -hpa