From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aviro@redhat.com,
drepper@redhat.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] correct flags to f_mode conversion in __dentry_open
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 19:54:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <483461DA.3060304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080317104537.GA32546@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 05:59:52PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> does 11 really mean and should it really always be mapped to (FMODE_READ
>>> | FMODE_WRITE) or should it continue to get mapped to 'no permission?'
>> We've always mapped 3 to "no permission" to read or write. It's a linuxism
>
> I've tripped over this recently aswell. It would for sure be useful
> to add a sumbolic O_FOO constant for this magic value '3' and document
> it in the manpage.
Late follow-up to this thread
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/653123):
I propose to add the following text to the open(2) man page.
Unlike the other values that can be specified in flags,
the access mode values O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY, and O_RDWR, do
not specify individual bits. Rather, they define the low
order two bits of flags, and are defined respectively as
0, 1, and 2. In other words, the combination O_RDONLY |
O_WRONLY is a logical error, and certainly does not have
the same meaning as O_RDWR. Linux reserves the special,
non-standard access mode 3 (binary 11) in flags to mean:
check for read and write permission on the file and
return a descriptor that can't be used for reading or
writing. This non-standard access mode is used by some
Linux drivers to return a descriptor that is only to be
used for device-specific ioctl(2) operations.
Seem okay?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-21 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 18:25 [RFC] correct flags to f_mode conversion in __dentry_open Eric Paris
2008-03-12 18:34 ` Al Viro
2008-03-12 18:41 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-12 18:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-03-15 21:59 ` Alan Cox
2008-03-15 22:00 ` Alexander Viro
2008-03-17 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-21 17:54 ` Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2008-05-22 2:10 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=483461DA.3060304@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages@googlemail.com \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).