From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933928AbYEVHgm (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 03:36:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758500AbYEVHge (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 03:36:34 -0400 Received: from mtagate3.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.136]:12334 "EHLO mtagate3.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758252AbYEVHgd (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 03:36:33 -0400 Message-ID: <48352277.4010703@fr.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 09:36:23 +0200 From: Cedric Le Goater User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Paul Menage , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Containers Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] remove node_ prefix_from ns subsystem References: <48344409.9090903@fr.ibm.com> <20080521220657.12e8e8c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <6599ad830805220011u77313ed7s2c0c9d4a658133cc@mail.gmail.com> <20080522003213.d677ba30.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080522003213.d677ba30.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 22 May 2008 00:11:56 -0700 "Paul Menage" wrote: > >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Andrew Morton >> wrote: >>>> --- 2.6.26-rc2-mm1.orig/kernel/cgroup.c >>>> +++ 2.6.26-rc2-mm1/kernel/cgroup.c >>>> @@ -2903,7 +2903,7 @@ int cgroup_clone(struct task_struct *tsk >>>> cg = tsk->cgroups; >>>> parent = task_cgroup(tsk, subsys->subsys_id); >>>> >>>> - snprintf(nodename, MAX_CGROUP_TYPE_NAMELEN, "node_%d", tsk->pid); >>>> + snprintf(nodename, MAX_CGROUP_TYPE_NAMELEN, "%d", tsk->pid); >>>> >>>> /* Pin the hierarchy */ >>>> atomic_inc(&parent->root->sb->s_active); >>> This is user-visible, isn't it? Been there since October. How can we >>> safely change it now? >> It is user-visible, but I'd be extremely surprised if anyone was >> depending on it or even using it at this point. > > After six months? yes that's what we believe also. > Oh well, I guess the number is small, and they'll know how to fix it. > > What is the reason for making this change? the 'node_' prefix really is superfluous and misleading. what's a node ? C.