Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?

Adrian Bunk
2008-05-21T22:26:22Z

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:20:50PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> While we are at the issue ALSA HG <-> GIT transition...
>
> One thing that annoys me sometimes is that the sound driver codes are
> on a different subdirectory than other normal drivers, namely under
> /sound. I don't remember exactly why it came there, but this often
> makes people forget to change the necessary code for the sound
> subsystem, or slip from the statistics (I'm not sure whether Linus
> counted sound/* with recent his posts).
>
> If I understand correctly, with git, we can move the files in
> relatively little costs. So, what about moving sound/* back to
> drivers/sound/* or drivers/media/sound/*?

Sounds good.

> Of course, the primary question is whether it's really worth.
> The obvious drawback is that patches won't be applicable after the
> move. So, if we do it, doing at the last seems practical. But, this
> can be a bit problem with keeping such a change on linux-next until
> the next merge...
>
> And, another question is to where. drivers/sound or
> drivers/media/sound, or whatever.

Under drivers/media/ it would only generate confusion regarding who's
responsible for what.

But drivers/sound/ sounds good.

The only possible problem that comes into my mind is to check what
happens with the link order.

> Any comments appreciated.
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed