From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757629AbYEXAjp (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 20:39:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751857AbYEXAjf (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 20:39:35 -0400 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:61131 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751542AbYEXAje (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 20:39:34 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5200,2160,5302"; a="3213747" Message-ID: <483763BE.40800@qualcomm.com> Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 17:39:26 -0700 From: Max Krasnyanskiy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Jackson CC: rdunlap@xenotime.net, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] [genirq] Expose default irq affinity mask References: <1211571995-17488-1-git-send-email-maxk@qualcomm.com> <20080523134702.e5fb9145.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <48372E2E.4020902@qualcomm.com> <20080523175447.e0c69591.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080523175447.e0c69591.pj@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Jackson wrote: > Max, replying to Randy: >>> Documentation, perhaps an update to Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt ? >> Absolutely. I wanted to see if it gets accepted first. > > For new features such as this, documentation is helpful in reviewing. > > (For me at least, documentation is even helpful in -writing- the code, > as I find that if I can't explain something in words clearly and > accurately, then my code is probably confused as well. However, I'm > obviously weird, and not just in this regard.) > >>>From what I can tell, it's ok. I look forward to seeing the Documentation, > and will review it again at that time. > There is not going to be whole a lot of documentation for this. Basically the commit comment is what will be in the documentation. In other words I do not think it'll help you with the review. Max