From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761444AbYEXSY4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2008 14:24:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759783AbYEXSYq (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2008 14:24:46 -0400 Received: from E23SMTP02.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.163]:53589 "EHLO e23smtp02.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759449AbYEXSYp (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2008 14:24:45 -0400 Message-ID: <48385CFA.7010201@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 23:52:50 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Organization: IBM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Righi CC: menage@google.com, matt@bluehost.com, roberto@unbit.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Containers Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cgroup: block device i/o bandwidth controller References: <> <1211648217-13361-1-git-send-email-righi.andrea@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1211648217-13361-1-git-send-email-righi.andrea@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrea Righi wrote: > I'm resending an updated version of the cgroup I/O bandwidth controller > that I wrote some months ago (http://lwn.net/Articles/265944), since > someone asked me recently. > > The goal of this patchset is to implement a block device I/O bandwidth > controller using cgroups. > > Detailed informations about design, its goal and usage are described in > the documentation. > > Review, comments and feedbacks are welcome. > Hi, Andrea, There are several parallel efforts for the IO controller? Could you describe/compare them with yours? Is any consensus building taking place? CC'ing containers mailing list. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL