From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] staging: lustre: ldlm: pl_recalc time handling is wrong
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:21:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4839295.T6k2aHkh3K@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161110122108.GA7580@kroah.com>
James Simmons reports:
> The ldlm_pool field pl_recalc_time is set to the current
> monotonic clock value but the interval period is calculated
> with the wall clock. This means the interval period will
> always be far larger than the pl_recalc_period, which is
> just a small interval time period. The correct thing to
> do is to use monotomic clock current value instead of the
> wall clocks value when calculating recalc_interval_sec.
This broke when I converted the 32-bit get_seconds() into
ktime_get_{real_,}seconds() inconsistently. Either
one of those two would have worked, but mixing them
does not.
Staying with the original intention of the patch, this
changes the ktime_get_seconds() calls into ktime_get_real_seconds(),
using real time instead of mononic time.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.4+
Fixes: 8f83409cf238 ("staging/lustre: use 64-bit time for pl_recalc")
Reported-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
v2: James' patch was similarly incomplete to mine, as it only
addressed some of the calls. With this new version, all ktime
accessors use the same time domain.
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c
index 19831c555c49..b820309d70e3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c
@@ -356,10 +356,10 @@ static int ldlm_pool_recalc(struct ldlm_pool *pl)
u32 recalc_interval_sec;
int count;
- recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;
+ recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_real_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;
if (recalc_interval_sec > 0) {
spin_lock(&pl->pl_lock);
- recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;
+ recalc_interval_sec = ktime_get_real_seconds() - pl->pl_recalc_time;
if (recalc_interval_sec > 0) {
/*
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int ldlm_pool_recalc(struct ldlm_pool *pl)
count);
}
- recalc_interval_sec = pl->pl_recalc_time - ktime_get_seconds() +
+ recalc_interval_sec = pl->pl_recalc_time - ktime_get_real_seconds() +
pl->pl_recalc_period;
if (recalc_interval_sec <= 0) {
/* DEBUG: should be re-removed after LU-4536 is fixed */
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ int ldlm_pool_init(struct ldlm_pool *pl, struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
spin_lock_init(&pl->pl_lock);
atomic_set(&pl->pl_granted, 0);
- pl->pl_recalc_time = ktime_get_seconds();
+ pl->pl_recalc_time = ktime_get_real_seconds();
atomic_set(&pl->pl_lock_volume_factor, 1);
atomic_set(&pl->pl_grant_rate, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-10 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-08 2:47 [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: pl_recalc time handling is wrong James Simmons
2016-11-09 3:50 ` [lustre-devel] " Dilger, Andreas
2016-11-09 16:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-10 12:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-11-10 15:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-10 17:53 ` James Simmons
2016-11-10 15:21 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-11-10 18:59 ` [PATCH v2] " James Simmons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4839295.T6k2aHkh3K@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox