From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
"Amit K. Arora" <aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] General framework for APERF/MPERF access and accounting
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 23:41:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <483AFD36.7050407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080526143138.24680.99086.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com>
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> General framework for low level APERF/MPERF access.
> * Avoid resetting APERF/MPERF in acpi-cpufreq.c
> * Implement functions that will calculate the scaled stats
> * acpi_get_pm_msrs_delta() will give delta values after reading the current values
> * Change get_measured_perf() to use acpi_get_pm_msrs_delta()
> * scaled_stats_init() detect availability of APERF/MPERF using cpuid
> * reset_for_scaled_stats() called when a process occupies the CPU
> * account_scaled_stats() is called when the process leaves the CPU
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit K. Arora <aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 21 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index b0c8208..761beec 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,13 @@ enum {
> #define INTEL_MSR_RANGE (0xffff)
> #define CPUID_6_ECX_APERFMPERF_CAPABILITY (0x1)
>
> +/* Buffer to store old snapshot values */
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, cpufreq_old_aperf);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, cpufreq_old_mperf);
> +
> +extern void acpi_get_pm_msrs_delta(u64 *aperf_delta, u64 *mperf_delta,
> + u64 *aperf_old, u64 *mperf_old, int reset);
> +
> struct acpi_cpufreq_data {
> struct acpi_processor_performance *acpi_data;
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> @@ -265,6 +272,7 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(unsigned int cpu)
> } split;
> u64 whole;
> } aperf_cur, mperf_cur;
> + u64 *aperf_old, *mperf_old;
>
> cpumask_t saved_mask;
> unsigned int perf_percent;
> @@ -278,11 +286,16 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(unsigned int cpu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf_cur.split.lo, aperf_cur.split.hi);
> - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf_cur.split.lo, mperf_cur.split.hi);
> + /*
> + * Get the old APERF/MPERF values for this cpu and pass it to
> + * acpi_get_pm_msrs_delta() which will read the current values
> + * and return the delta.
> + */
> + aperf_old = &(per_cpu(cpufreq_old_aperf, smp_processor_id()));
> + mperf_old = &(per_cpu(cpufreq_old_mperf, smp_processor_id()));
>
> - wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0,0);
> - wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0,0);
> + acpi_get_pm_msrs_delta(&aperf_cur.whole, &mperf_cur.whole,
> + aperf_old, mperf_old, 1);
>
> #ifdef __i386__
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c
> index 2ff21f3..5131e01 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c
> @@ -32,10 +32,13 @@
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/time.h>
> #include <linux/mca.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
>
> #include <asm/arch_hooks.h>
> #include <asm/hpet.h>
> #include <asm/time.h>
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
> +#include <asm/cputime.h>
>
> #include "do_timer.h"
>
> @@ -136,3 +139,171 @@ void __init time_init(void)
> tsc_init();
> late_time_init = choose_time_init();
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * This function should be used to get the APERF/MPERF MSRS delta from the cpu.
> + * We let the individual users of this function store the old values of APERF
> + * and MPERF registers in per cpu variables. They pass these old values as 3rd
> + * and 4th arguments. 'reset' tells if the old values should be reset or not.
> + * Mostly, users of this function will like to reset the old values.
> + */
> +void acpi_get_pm_msrs_delta(u64 *aperf_delta, u64 *mperf_delta, u64 *aperf_old,
> + u64 *mperf_old, int reset)
> +{
> + union {
> + struct {
> + u32 lo;
> + u32 hi;
> + } split;
> + u64 whole;
> + } aperf_cur, mperf_cur;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /* Read current values of APERF and MPERF MSRs*/
> + local_irq_save(flags);
Why do we need to do this? We've already disabled pre-emption in the caller?
> + rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf_cur.split.lo, mperf_cur.split.hi);
> + rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf_cur.split.lo, aperf_cur.split.hi);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +
> + /*
> + * If the new values are less than the previous values, there has
> + * been an overflow and both APERF and MPERF have been reset to
> + * zero. In this case consider absolute value as diff/delta.
> + * Note that we do not check for 'reset' here, since resetting here
> + * is no more optional and has to be done for values to make sense.
> + */
> + if (unlikely((mperf_cur.whole <= *mperf_old) ||
> + (aperf_cur.whole <= *aperf_old)))
> + {
> + *aperf_old = 0;
> + *mperf_old = 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Calculate the delta from the current and per cpu old values */
> + *mperf_delta = mperf_cur.whole - *mperf_old;
> + *aperf_delta = aperf_cur.whole - *aperf_old;
> +
> + /* Set the per cpu variables to current readings */
> + if (reset) {
> + *mperf_old = mperf_cur.whole;
> + *aperf_old = aperf_cur.whole;
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_get_pm_msrs_delta);
> +
> +
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, cputime_old_aperf);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, cputime_old_mperf);
> +
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(cputime_t, task_utime_old);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(cputime_t, task_stime_old);
> +
I fail to understand the per cpu variable for task_utime_old and task_stime_old?
What does it represent? Why is it global?
> +
> +#define CPUID_6_ECX_APERFMPERF_CAPABILITY (0x1)
> +
> +static int cpu_supports_freq_scaling;
> +
> +/* Initialize scaled stat functions */
> +void scaled_stats_init(void)
> +{
> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
> +
> + /* Check for APERF/MPERF support in hardware */
> + if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL && c->cpuid_level >= 6) {
> + unsigned int ecx;
> + ecx = cpuid_ecx(6);
> + if (ecx & CPUID_6_ECX_APERFMPERF_CAPABILITY)
> + cpu_supports_freq_scaling = 1;
> + else
> + cpu_supports_freq_scaling = -1;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Reset the old utime and stime (percpu) value to the new task
> + * that we are going to switch to.
> + */
> +void reset_for_scaled_stats(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + u64 aperf_delta, mperf_delta;
> + u64 *aperf_old, *mperf_old;
> +
> + if (cpu_supports_freq_scaling < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + if(!cpu_supports_freq_scaling) {
> + scaled_stats_init();
> + if(cpu_supports_freq_scaling < 0)
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + aperf_old = &(per_cpu(cputime_old_aperf, smp_processor_id()));
> + mperf_old = &(per_cpu(cputime_old_mperf, smp_processor_id()));
> + acpi_get_pm_msrs_delta(&aperf_delta, &mperf_delta, aperf_old,
> + mperf_old, 1);
> +
> + per_cpu(task_utime_old, smp_processor_id()) = tsk->utime;
> + per_cpu(task_stime_old, smp_processor_id()) = tsk->stime;
> +}
> +
I hope this routine is called with preemption disabled
> +
> +/* Account scaled statistics for a task on context switch */
> +void account_scaled_stats(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + u64 aperf_delta, mperf_delta;
> + u64 *aperf_old, *mperf_old;
> + cputime_t time;
> + u64 time_msec;
> + int readmsrs = 1;
> +
> + if(!cpu_supports_freq_scaling)
> + scaled_stats_init();
> +
> + /*
> + * Get the old APERF/MPERF values for this cpu and pass it to
> + * acpi_get_pm_msrs_delta() which will read the current values
> + * and return the delta.
> + */
> + aperf_old = &(per_cpu(cputime_old_aperf, smp_processor_id()));
> + mperf_old = &(per_cpu(cputime_old_mperf, smp_processor_id()));
> +
> + if (cputime_gt(tsk->utime, per_cpu(task_utime_old,
> + smp_processor_id()))) {
> + acpi_get_pm_msrs_delta(&aperf_delta, &mperf_delta, aperf_old,
> + mperf_old, 1);
> + readmsrs = 0;
> + time = cputime_sub(tsk->utime, per_cpu(task_utime_old,
> + smp_processor_id()));
> + time_msec = cputime_to_msecs(time);
> + time_msec *= 1000; /* Scale it to hold fractional values */
What is 1000? The code is not clear
> + if (cpu_supports_freq_scaling == 1) {
> + time_msec *= aperf_delta;
> + time_msec = div64_u64(time_msec, mperf_delta);
> + }
> + time = msecs_to_cputime(time_msec);
> + account_user_time_scaled(tsk, time);
> + per_cpu(task_utime_old, smp_processor_id()) = tsk->utime;
> + }
> +
> + if (cputime_gt(tsk->stime, per_cpu(task_stime_old,
> + smp_processor_id()))) {
> + if (readmsrs)
> + acpi_get_pm_msrs_delta(&aperf_delta, &mperf_delta,
> + aperf_old, mperf_old, 1);
> + time = cputime_sub(tsk->stime, per_cpu(task_stime_old,
> + smp_processor_id()));
> +
> + time_msec = cputime_to_msecs(time);
> + time_msec *= 1000; /* Scale it to hold fractional values */
> + if (cpu_supports_freq_scaling == 1) {
> + time_msec *= aperf_delta;
> + time_msec = div64_u64(time_msec, mperf_delta);
> + }
> + time = msecs_to_cputime(time_msec);
> + account_system_time_scaled(tsk, time);
> + per_cpu(task_stime_old, smp_processor_id()) = tsk->stime;
> + }
> +
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_scaled_stats);
> +
>
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-26 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-26 14:31 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Scaled statistics using APERF/MPERF in x86 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-26 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] General framework for APERF/MPERF access and accounting Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-26 18:11 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-05-27 14:54 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-26 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] Make calls to account_scaled_stats Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-26 18:18 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-27 15:02 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-29 15:18 ` Michael Neuling
2008-05-29 18:23 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-26 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] Print scaled utime and stime in getdelays Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-26 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Scaled statistics using APERF/MPERF in x86 Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-26 17:24 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-26 18:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-26 18:36 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-26 18:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-27 12:59 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-27 13:19 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-27 14:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-27 15:27 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-31 21:27 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-02 17:54 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-06-03 2:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-27 13:29 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-27 14:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-27 15:20 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-27 14:04 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-27 16:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-27 18:26 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-05-31 21:17 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-31 21:13 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-02 6:08 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=483AFD36.7050407@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox