From: "Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@kernel.org>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
bojan@rexursive.com, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Security Modules List
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] security: was "Re: capget() overflows buffers."
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 18:17:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <483B611B.6040006@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080524080734.GV30402@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2479 bytes --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chris Wright wrote:
| * Andrew G. Morgan (morgan@kernel.org) wrote:
|> Your concern is for the situation when the garbage happens to correspond
|> to an apparently meaningful setting for the upper capability bits? The
|> problem being that this privileged application is more privileged than
|> intended? I agree that this is not ideal.
|
| Yep, exactly.
|
|> In practice, however, this is only a real problem if named (or a
|> similarly structured program) has a security related bug in it. No?
|
| It's dropped privileges to help mitigate any security related bug it
| may contain. It's conceivable (albeit remote[1]) that fork/exec plus
| inheritable could leak privs w/out a security related bug.
|
|> Is this your concern, or have I missed something?
|
| That's it.
OK, so by way of summary, the kernel, per se, is *not* broken, but the
kernel include file is problematic for use by user space - ie., having
used it some recompiled programs may be subtly broken... [ Example,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447518 ]
Basically I agree that we should err on the side of being conservative...
| thanks,
| -chris
|
| [1] Get lucky combo in the garbage bits and have not shed uid 0.
| Much less likely.
So far as I can tell, the two problems (for unprepared applications -
not using libcap etc.) are:
~ 1. what the capget() system call may be writing to data[1] may lead to
unpredictable reliability issues with the security of the running
program (when its only allocated space for data[0]).
~ 2. the garbage that the capset() system call may be setting in pI that
persists post-exec(). The security issue being (in the case that the
system has been configured with filesystem capability support) the leak
of inheritable bits that become effective through the subsequent
invocation of a filesystem-capable (fI != 0) application. The net result
being that this subsequent application gives capabilities to a user that
shouldn't wield them.
How about the attached for a combined patch? Chris, the only change over
last time is basically your suggested code change, with more comments
and a less cautious warning...
Cheers
Andrew
Ref: patch: 0c736c9f0ab16899df1803d5962287985e69a157
and libcap-2.10 supports this change.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIO2Ea+bHCR3gb8jsRAowdAJ9kMa15tXLyv6t1EfV0pyOsbqk49QCgsjRJ
+SCiUsbN7M5nfdehXBWjzt0=
=Ri1u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[-- Attachment #2: remain-source-compatible-with-32-bit-raw-legacy-capa.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 9735 bytes --]
From 0c736c9f0ab16899df1803d5962287985e69a157 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 18:06:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Remain source compatible with 32-bit raw legacy capability support.
Source code out there hard-codes a notion of what the
_LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION #define means in terms of the semantics of
the raw capability system calls capget() and capset(). Its unfortunate,
but true.
Since the confusing header file has been in a released kernel, there
is software that is erroneously using 64-bit capabilities with the
semantics of 32-bit compatibilities. These recently compiled programs
may suffer corruption of their memory when sys_getcap() overwrites
more memory than they are coded to expect, and the raising of added
capabilities when using sys_capset().
As such, this patch does a number of things to clean up the situation
for all. It
1. forces the _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION define to always retain its
legacy value.
2. adopts a new #define strategy for the kernel's internal
implementation of the preferred magic.
3. depreciates v2 capability magic in favor of a new (v3) magic
number. The functionality of v3 is entirely equivalent to v2,
the only difference being that the v2 magic causes the kernel
to log a "depreciated" warning so the admin can find applications
that may be using v2 inappropriately.
[User space code continues to be encouraged to use the libcap API
which protects the application from details like this. libcap-2.10
is the first to support v3 capabilities.]
Signed-off-by: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
---
fs/proc/array.c | 2 +-
include/linux/capability.h | 29 ++++++++---
kernel/capability.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
index 9e3b8c3..797d775 100644
--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static void render_cap_t(struct seq_file *m, const char *header,
seq_printf(m, "%s", header);
CAP_FOR_EACH_U32(__capi) {
seq_printf(m, "%08x",
- a->cap[(_LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S-1) - __capi]);
+ a->cap[(_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S-1) - __capi]);
}
seq_printf(m, "\n");
}
diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
index f4ea0dd..272e040 100644
--- a/include/linux/capability.h
+++ b/include/linux/capability.h
@@ -31,11 +31,11 @@ struct task_struct;
#define _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_1 0x19980330
#define _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_1 1
-#define _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_2 0x20071026
+#define _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_2 0x20071026 /* depreciated - use v3 */
#define _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_2 2
-#define _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_2
-#define _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_2
+#define _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_3 0x20080522
+#define _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_3 2
typedef struct __user_cap_header_struct {
__u32 version;
@@ -77,10 +77,23 @@ struct vfs_cap_data {
} data[VFS_CAP_U32];
};
-#ifdef __KERNEL__
+#ifndef __KERNEL__
+
+/*
+ * Backwardly compatible definition for source code - trapped in a
+ * 32-bit world. If you find you need this, please consider using
+ * libcap to untrap yourself...
+ */
+#define _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_1
+#define _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_1
+
+#else
+
+#define _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_VERSION _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_3
+#define _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_3
typedef struct kernel_cap_struct {
- __u32 cap[_LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S];
+ __u32 cap[_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S];
} kernel_cap_t;
#define _USER_CAP_HEADER_SIZE (sizeof(struct __user_cap_header_struct))
@@ -351,7 +364,7 @@ typedef struct kernel_cap_struct {
*/
#define CAP_FOR_EACH_U32(__capi) \
- for (__capi = 0; __capi < _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S; ++__capi)
+ for (__capi = 0; __capi < _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S; ++__capi)
# define CAP_FS_MASK_B0 (CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_CHOWN) \
| CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE) \
@@ -361,7 +374,7 @@ typedef struct kernel_cap_struct {
# define CAP_FS_MASK_B1 (CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE))
-#if _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S != 2
+#if _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S != 2
# error Fix up hand-coded capability macro initializers
#else /* HAND-CODED capability initializers */
@@ -372,7 +385,7 @@ typedef struct kernel_cap_struct {
# define CAP_NFSD_SET ((kernel_cap_t){{ CAP_FS_MASK_B0|CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE), \
CAP_FS_MASK_B1 } })
-#endif /* _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S != 2 */
+#endif /* _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S != 2 */
#define CAP_INIT_INH_SET CAP_EMPTY_SET
diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
index 39e8193..326406c 100644
--- a/kernel/capability.c
+++ b/kernel/capability.c
@@ -53,6 +53,68 @@ static void warn_legacy_capability_use(void)
}
/*
+ * Version 2 capabilities worked fine, but the linux/capability.h file
+ * that accompanied their introduction encouraged their use without
+ * the necessary user-space source code changes. As such, we have
+ * created a version 3 with equivalent functionality to version 2, but
+ * with a header change to protect legacy source code from using
+ * version 2 when it wanted to use version 1. If your system has code
+ * that trips the following warning, it is using version 2 specific
+ * capabilities and may be doing so insecurely.
+ *
+ * The remedy is to either upgrade your version of libcap (to 2.10+,
+ * if the application is linked against it), or recompile your
+ * application with modern kernel headers and this warning will go
+ * away.
+ */
+
+static void warn_depreciated_v2(void)
+{
+ static int warned = 0;
+ if (!warned) {
+ char name[sizeof(current->comm)];
+
+ printk(KERN_INFO "warning: `%s' uses depreciated v2"
+ " capabilities in a way that may be insecure.\n",
+ get_task_comm(name, current));
+ warned = 1;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Version check. Return the number of u32s in each capability flag
+ * array, or a negative value on error.
+ */
+static int cap_validate_magic(cap_user_header_t header, unsigned *tocopy)
+{
+ __u32 version;
+
+ if (get_user(version, &header->version))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ switch (version) {
+ case _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_1:
+ warn_legacy_capability_use();
+ *tocopy = _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_1;
+ break;
+ case _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_2:
+ warn_depreciated_v2();
+ /*
+ * fall through - v3 is otherwise equivalent to v2.
+ */
+ case _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_3:
+ *tocopy = _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_3;
+ break;
+ default:
+ if (put_user(_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_VERSION, &header->version))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
* For sys_getproccap() and sys_setproccap(), any of the three
* capability set pointers may be NULL -- indicating that that set is
* uninteresting and/or not to be changed.
@@ -71,27 +133,13 @@ asmlinkage long sys_capget(cap_user_header_t header, cap_user_data_t dataptr)
{
int ret = 0;
pid_t pid;
- __u32 version;
struct task_struct *target;
unsigned tocopy;
kernel_cap_t pE, pI, pP;
- if (get_user(version, &header->version))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- switch (version) {
- case _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_1:
- warn_legacy_capability_use();
- tocopy = _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_1;
- break;
- case _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_2:
- tocopy = _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_2;
- break;
- default:
- if (put_user(_LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION, &header->version))
- return -EFAULT;
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ ret = cap_validate_magic(header, &tocopy);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ return ret;
if (get_user(pid, &header->pid))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -118,7 +166,7 @@ out:
spin_unlock(&task_capability_lock);
if (!ret) {
- struct __user_cap_data_struct kdata[_LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S];
+ struct __user_cap_data_struct kdata[_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S];
unsigned i;
for (i = 0; i < tocopy; i++) {
@@ -128,7 +176,7 @@ out:
}
/*
- * Note, in the case, tocopy < _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S,
+ * Note, in the case, tocopy < _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S,
* we silently drop the upper capabilities here. This
* has the effect of making older libcap
* implementations implicitly drop upper capability
@@ -240,30 +288,16 @@ static inline int cap_set_all(kernel_cap_t *effective,
*/
asmlinkage long sys_capset(cap_user_header_t header, const cap_user_data_t data)
{
- struct __user_cap_data_struct kdata[_LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S];
+ struct __user_cap_data_struct kdata[_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S];
unsigned i, tocopy;
kernel_cap_t inheritable, permitted, effective;
- __u32 version;
struct task_struct *target;
int ret;
pid_t pid;
- if (get_user(version, &header->version))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- switch (version) {
- case _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_1:
- warn_legacy_capability_use();
- tocopy = _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_1;
- break;
- case _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_2:
- tocopy = _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_2;
- break;
- default:
- if (put_user(_LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION, &header->version))
- return -EFAULT;
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ ret = cap_validate_magic(header, &tocopy);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ return ret;
if (get_user(pid, &header->pid))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -281,7 +315,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_capset(cap_user_header_t header, const cap_user_data_t data)
permitted.cap[i] = kdata[i].permitted;
inheritable.cap[i] = kdata[i].inheritable;
}
- while (i < _LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S) {
+ while (i < _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S) {
effective.cap[i] = 0;
permitted.cap[i] = 0;
inheritable.cap[i] = 0;
--
1.5.3.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-27 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-22 14:04 capget() overflows buffers Dave Jones
2008-05-22 17:58 ` Chris Wright
2008-05-22 20:53 ` Chris Wright
2008-05-22 22:52 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2008-05-22 23:37 ` Chris Wright
2008-05-23 7:09 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2008-05-23 15:57 ` Chris Wright
2008-05-24 6:25 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2008-05-24 8:07 ` Chris Wright
2008-05-27 1:17 ` Andrew G. Morgan [this message]
2008-05-27 21:42 ` [PATCH] security: was "Re: capget() overflows buffers." Chris Wright
2008-05-28 3:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-23 18:26 ` capget() overflows buffers Chris Wright
2008-05-24 0:02 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2008-05-24 1:09 ` Chris Wright
2008-05-24 4:40 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2008-05-24 8:17 ` Chris Wright
2008-05-23 1:20 ` Bojan Smojver
2008-05-23 2:06 ` Chris Wright
2008-05-23 4:01 ` Bojan Smojver
2008-05-22 21:20 ` Bojan Smojver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=483B611B.6040006@kernel.org \
--to=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bojan@rexursive.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox