From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit - fix #2
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:24:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <483DCD97.20103@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440805281348u2fdd6ce2t71231f0fc94d8b5b@mail.gmail.com>
Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> @@ -1266,6 +1266,15 @@
>> add_preferred_console("hvc", 0, NULL);
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Reserve Xen bits:
>> + * - mfn_list
>> + * - xen_start_info
>> + * See comment above "struct start_info" in <xen/interface/xen.h>
>> + */
>> + reserve_early(__pa(xen_start_info->mfn_list),
>> + __pa(xen_start_info->pt_base), "XEN");
>> +
>>
>
> can we use e820 entries for that? So the domain builder could have
> several entries for E820_RAM and E820_RESERVED...
>
Yeah, seems reasonable. I'll try it out.
> will need x86_64_start_kernel there, maybe we should change all name
> to x86_start_kernel
We can do that later. For now it's better to give them distinct names.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-28 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-11 7:30 [PATCH] x86: make e820.c to have common functions Yinghai Lu
2008-05-13 13:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-13 17:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-18 8:18 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit Yinghai Lu
2008-05-21 3:10 ` [PATCH] x86: move e820_mark_nosave_regions to e820.c Yinghai Lu
2008-05-22 1:40 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit - fix Yinghai Lu
2008-05-22 10:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-22 17:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-22 22:20 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit - fix v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-23 23:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-23 23:32 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-23 23:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 0:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-24 0:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-24 8:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 9:49 ` [PATCH] xen: boot via i386_start_kernel to get early reservations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 22:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-24 19:57 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit - fix v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-25 17:00 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 ealy_res support 32bit - fix #2 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-27 15:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-27 20:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-27 20:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-27 21:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-27 21:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-27 21:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-27 21:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-27 21:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-27 22:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-28 10:01 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-28 20:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-28 21:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-05-29 13:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-29 18:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-29 18:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-29 18:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-29 19:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-05-30 15:50 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-29 19:56 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 early_res support 32bit -fix #3 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-29 19:57 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 early_res support 32bit -fix #4 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-29 19:58 ` [PATCH] x86: extend e820 early_res support 32bit -fix #5 Yinghai Lu
2008-05-29 23:25 ` [PATCH] x86: 32bit numa srat fix early_ioremap leak Yinghai Lu
2008-05-31 8:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-01 5:51 ` [PATCH] x86: 32bit numa increase max_elements to 1024 Yinghai Lu
2008-06-01 5:52 ` [PATCH] x86: change propagate_e820_map back to find_max_pfn -32bit Yinghai Lu
2008-06-01 5:53 ` [PATCH] x86: set node_remap_size[0] in fallback path Yinghai Lu
2008-06-01 5:56 ` [PATCH] x86: numa_32 print out debug info all kva Yinghai Lu
2008-06-01 20:15 ` [PATCH] x86: numa_32 print out debug info all kva v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-06-03 2:16 ` [PATCH] x86: change propagate_e820_map back to find_max_pfn -32bit -v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-06-02 4:06 ` [PATCH] x86: numa_32 avoid clash between ramdisk and kva Yinghai Lu
2008-06-02 6:53 ` [PATCH] x86: cleanup max_pfn_mapped usage - 32bit Yinghai Lu
2008-06-02 6:55 ` [PATCH] x86: cleanup max_pfn_mapped usage - 64bit Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=483DCD97.20103@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox