From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755270AbYE2DmN (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2008 23:42:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752848AbYE2Dl7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2008 23:41:59 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:61296 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752784AbYE2Dl6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2008 23:41:58 -0400 Message-ID: <483E25D4.6090809@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:41:08 +0800 From: Miao Xie Reply-To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Jackson CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cpusets: update tasks' cpus_allowed and mems_allowed after CPU/NODE offline/online References: <483E1D77.30400@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080528223353.61affb22.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080528223353.61affb22.pj@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org on 2008-5-29 11:33 Paul Jackson wrote: > Miao wrote: >> Though the patch is a little big, most of the change is just code restruction. > > This looks like a nice bug fix - thanks! > > Allow me to ask a question, but I hope you will be happy to answer yes > or no, either way, as you see it. > > The question is: > > Would it be easy to split this patch into two pieces, where: > 1) the first piece contains the restructuring (but is still buggy), and > 2) the second piece has just the bug fix? > ok, I will do it. Miao Xie > If that would be easy, that might make a nice way to present this fix. > > If that would not be so easy, that's ok ... I can still review easily > enough. I'll just have to drink an extra cup of coffee first, to make > my mind a little more alert . >