From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757531AbYE2QaZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 12:30:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754458AbYE2QaK (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 12:30:10 -0400 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:45340 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753775AbYE2QaH (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 12:30:07 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5200,2160,5306"; a="3321775" Message-ID: <483EDA0D.5020404@qualcomm.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:30:05 -0700 From: Max Krasnyanskiy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Jackson CC: mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [sched] Move cpu masks from kernel/sched.c into kernel/cpu.c References: <1211926006-11559-1-git-send-email-maxk@qualcomm.com> <20080528234025.621bce6a.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080528234025.621bce6a.pj@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Jackson wrote: > Max, > > Does this patch mean that some 2K to 3K bytes of kernel text > will be added to non-SMP systems, due to kernel/cpu.o moving > from CONFIG_SMP only to always being included? > > If so, then I'd think that the folks who obsess with small > non-SMP kernels might not like this change. > non-SMP ? Do people still build those :) ? Just kidding. Hmm, why would it be any different ? I've just build UP kernel with and w/o the patch size vmlinux before text data bss dec hex filename 3313797 307060 310352 3931209 3bfc49 vmlinux after text data bss dec hex filename 3313797 307060 310352 3931209 3bfc49 vmlinux I think we're good here. Max