From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758575AbYE2Qkm (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 12:40:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755543AbYE2Qka (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 12:40:30 -0400 Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.30]:19112 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755142AbYE2Qk2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 12:40:28 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hG7r3BSKJ+zpFDLt1QwUZK8wQVWXV+txxfvhGOBqXfJbdmOTX6cXMjUpimiHQoCnZJ5F4tO0d8mjkeJux1nq2y574KQZgPBn0UskO/ZGVs34jmVtOmsIXiLrQGFqmLMu09ibNc4YlsXw8PXLCFbcb0Cm1HZmBU5Jb7FK82DmStA= Message-ID: <483EDC73.8030602@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 01:40:19 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Garrett , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Handle bay devices in dock stations References: <20080528143857.GB5585@homac.suse.de> <20080529132253.GA22309@srcf.ucam.org> <483EB33D.6010101@gmail.com> <20080529140213.GA23373@srcf.ucam.org> <20080529141421.GC9268@homac.suse.de> <20080529143541.GA24013@srcf.ucam.org> <483EBFC5.7020406@gmail.com> <20080529144934.GA24382@srcf.ucam.org> <20080529163201.GA4520@homac> In-Reply-To: <20080529163201.GA4520@homac> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Holger Macht wrote: > On Thu 29. May - 15:49:34, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> Got it. It works if I lose the ata_port_freeze() from >> ata_acpi_detach_device. > > Tejun, any idea? This is in for quite some time now. Maybe there's some > involved... Does changing it to ata_port_schedule_eh() make any difference? -- tejun