From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759443AbYE2X2n (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 19:28:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754930AbYE2X2g (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 19:28:36 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:38634 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754390AbYE2X2f (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 19:28:35 -0400 Message-ID: <483F3C27.40508@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 18:28:39 -0500 From: Jon Tollefson Organization: IBM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Bligh CC: "Randy.Dunlap" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Theodore Tso , Hugh Dickins , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Suresh Siddha , Venkatesh Pallipadi , bugme-admin@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [Bug #10732] REGRESSION: 2.6.26-rc2-git4: X server failed start on X61s laptop References: <1NnHL0AVfcI.A.hJC.ZdIOIB@albercik> <20080526192247.GA7515@mit.edu> <20080527125426.GJ7515@mit.edu> <200805292254.55248.rjw@sisk.pl> <8f3aa8d60805291454s280a28d1g6c3891276c69a69e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8f3aa8d60805291454s280a28d1g6c3891276c69a69e@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Bligh wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > >> On Thu, 29 May 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> >>> On Tuesday, 27 of May 2008, Theodore Tso wrote: >>> >>>> Bug #10732 is now closed. BTW, it seems d*mned strange that the >>>> submitter of the bug doesn't have the power to close a bug without >>>> first grabbing the bug as the bug-fixer, changing its state to >>>> ASSIGNED, and *then* being allowed to close the bug. Grumble, >>>> bugzilla's !#@#?@ process straightjacket.... >>>> >>> That depends on your account's access rights within the Bugzilla, which always >>> have been a mystery to me. >>> >> Martin Bligh should be able to clear that mystery up. >> > > Jon ... is that something we can configure? Seems ... wrong. > Submitter and owner should both have power to edit the bug. > Submitter and owner should be able to edit the bug as far I as can see. If the bug is not already in the resolved state then you can use the Close check box at the end of the 'Resolve' option line to close a bug with one submit. You do not have to change it to the assign state in order to close it either - if it is the submitter or owner that is closing it. These statements do not apply to bugzilla in general but do apply to the bugzilla.kernel.org one. Jon