Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask()

Miao Xie
2008-05-30T02:16:54Z

on 2008-5-30 9:53 Paul Jackson wrote:
> Miao wrote:
>> I think that it is unnecessary to change cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked()'s comment
>> because it isn't a static function, it is a extern function
>
> Yes, you are correct. My mistake. Sorry.
>

I check kernel/cpuset.c and find many static functions with "/**" comment.
So I want to remove the special commenting convention for them.