From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755992AbYE3CQy (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 22:16:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752913AbYE3CQo (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 22:16:44 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:50618 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752742AbYE3CQo (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 22:16:44 -0400 Message-ID: <483F6367.1040701@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 10:16:07 +0800 From: Miao Xie Reply-To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Jackson CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask() References: <483E564A.5050807@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080529031656.cdc38001.pj@sgi.com> <483F5DAA.5060004@cn.fujitsu.com> <20080529205344.4ba1efdb.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20080529205344.4ba1efdb.pj@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org on 2008-5-30 9:53 Paul Jackson wrote: > Miao wrote: >> I think that it is unnecessary to change cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked()'s comment >> because it isn't a static function, it is a extern function > > Yes, you are correct. My mistake. Sorry. > I check kernel/cpuset.c and find many static functions with "/**" comment. So I want to remove the special commenting convention for them.