From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755920AbYE3WgP (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 18:36:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751896AbYE3Wf7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 18:35:59 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21]:43907 "EHLO orsmga101.jf.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751869AbYE3Wf7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 18:35:59 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,568,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="388822411" Message-ID: <48408150.5030501@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 15:36:00 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jochen_Vo=DF?= CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings for the week of May 30th 2008 References: <48402DAA.60202@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jochen Voß wrote: > Hi Arjan, > > 2008/5/30 Arjan van de Ven : >> Rank 2: sysfs_add_one (warning) >> Reported 243 times (759 total reports) > [...] >> Rank 3: mark_buffer_dirty (warning) >> Reported 222 times (759 total reports) > > It seems like a strange coincidence that the first two entries have > the same number of total reports. Is this really the case or is there > something mixed up? coincidence; I just recreated a new version of the report (so several hours later) and they're 1 appart now.