From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] paravirt: add hooks for ptep_modify_prot_start/commit
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:57:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4843E00C.1080407@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080602111249.GA18586@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>
>
>> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_MODIFY_PROT_TRANSACTION
>>
>
> please turn this into CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTEP_MODIFY_PROT_TRANSACTION
> instead.
The __HAVE_ARCH_ form is consistent with all the other conditional
things in asm/pgtable.h, like __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_SET_ACCESS_FLAGS,
__HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_TEST_AND_CLEAR_YOUNG, etc. I don't think adding
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ for this one case is a good idea.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-02 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-31 0:04 [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction (take 2) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-31 0:04 ` [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-02 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-02 11:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-02 13:02 ` [PATCH] mm: fix comment formatting in asm-generic/pgtable.h:__ptep_modify_prot_ Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-02 23:45 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-02 23:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-13 7:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-31 0:04 ` [PATCH 2 of 4] paravirt: add hooks for ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-02 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-02 11:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-05-31 0:04 ` [PATCH 3 of 4] xen: implement ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-31 0:04 ` [PATCH 4 of 4] xen: add mechanism to extend existing multicalls Jeremy Fitzhardinge
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-16 11:29 [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction (take 2) Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-16 11:30 ` [PATCH 2 of 4] paravirt: add hooks for ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4843E00C.1080407@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox