public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>,
	mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel marker has no performance impact on ia64.
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:28:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4847F811.7060406@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212653539.19205.47.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

Hi Peter and Mathieu,

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 19:22 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> * Peter Zijlstra (peterz@infradead.org) wrote:
> 
>>> So are you proposing something like:
>>>
>>> static inline void 
>>> trace_sched_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
>>> {
>>> 	trace_mark(sched_switch, prev, next);
>>> }
>>>
>> Not exactly. Something more along the lines of
>>
>> static inline void 
>> trace_sched_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
>> {
>>   /* Internal tracers. */
>>   ftrace_sched_switch(prev, next);
>>   othertracer_sched_switch(prev, next);
>>   /*
>>    * System-wide tracing. Useful information is exported here.
>>    * Probes connecting to these markers are expected to only use the
>>    * information provided to them for data collection purpose. Type
>>    * casting pointers is discouraged.
>>    */
>> 	trace_mark(kernel_sched_switch, "prev_pid %d next_pid %d prev_state %ld",
>>     prev->pid, next->pid, prev->state);
>> }
> 
> Advantage of my method would be that ftrace (and othertracer) can use
> the same marker and doesn't need yet another hoook.

If so, I'd like to suggest below changes,

- introduce below macro in marker.h

#define DEFINE_TRACE(name, vargs, args...)	\
static inline void trace_##name vargs		\
{						\
	trace_mark(name, #vargs, ##args);	\
}

- remove __marker_check_format from __trace_mark
- and write a definition in sched_trace.h

DEFINE_TRACE(sched_switch, (struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next),
	     prev, next);

Thus, we can remove fmt string and also ensure the type checking, because;
- Type checking at the trace point is done by the compiler.
- Type checking of probe handler can be done by comparing #vargs strings.

Thanks,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-05 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-02 22:12 Kernel marker has no performance impact on ia64 Hideo AOKI
2008-06-02 22:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-02 23:21   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-03  6:07     ` Takashi Nishiie
2008-06-04  4:58     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-04 23:26       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-04 23:40         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-04 22:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-04 23:22       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-05  8:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-05 14:28           ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2008-06-12 14:04             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-12 15:31               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-12 13:53           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-12 14:27             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-12 15:53               ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-12 16:16                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-12 16:43                   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-12 16:56                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-12 22:10                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-12 17:05                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-12 17:48                       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-12 19:34                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-13  4:19                           ` Takashi Nishiie
2008-06-13 18:02                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-16  2:58                               ` Takashi Nishiie
2008-06-12 16:53                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-12 17:38                   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-13 11:01                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-13 14:17                       ` Frank Ch. Eigler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4847F811.7060406@redhat.com \
    --to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=haoki@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox