From: Hanna Linder <hannal@us.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Cc: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [RFC] dcache scalability patch (2.4.17)
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:50:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48480000.1026514224@w-hlinder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0207121021430.11261-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
--On Friday, July 12, 2002 10:29:53 -0400 Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Maneesh Soni wrote:
>
>> Here is the dcache scalability patch (cleaned up) as disscussed in
>> the previous post to lkml by Dipankar. The patch uses RCU for doing fast
>> dcache lookup. It also does lazy updates to lru list of dentries to
>> avoid doing write operations while doing lookup.
>
> Where is
> * version for 2.5.<current>
> * analysis of benefits in real-world situations for 2.5 version?
>
> Patch adds complexity and unless you can show that it gives significant
> benefits outside of pathological situations, it's not going in.
Here are the slides where I presented, among other things, some
performance results of fastwalk compared to using rcu with lazy
updating of the d_lru list. The results are similar to what Dipankar
just published but there are a few more data points.
http://lse.sf.net/locking
Thanks.
Hanna
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-12 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-12 14:09 [RFC] dcache scalability patch (2.4.17) Maneesh Soni
2002-07-12 14:13 ` [Lse-tech] " Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-12 16:20 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-07-15 8:10 ` Maneesh Soni
2002-07-15 8:25 ` Maneesh Soni
2002-07-12 14:29 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-12 16:10 ` [Lse-tech] " Dipankar Sarma
2002-07-12 18:02 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-07-12 18:10 ` Hanna Linder
2002-07-12 17:35 ` Paul Menage
2002-07-13 8:52 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-13 17:25 ` Paul Menage
2002-07-13 17:33 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-13 17:51 ` Paul Menage
2002-07-13 17:54 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-15 0:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-12 22:50 ` Hanna Linder [this message]
2002-07-15 7:49 ` Maneesh Soni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48480000.1026514224@w-hlinder \
--to=hannal@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox