Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5

Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06T15:23:59Z

* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> AFAICS this is not yet required for v2.6.26, as the requirement to
> >> never iterate to MAX_NUMNODES and call nr_cpus_node() with the
> >> index only got introduced by Mike's patch.
> >
> > the one below is needed as well i think.
>
> Yeah. I think you had better take Mike's patches, I don't trust even
> that my patch and your fixlet does everything correctly.

yep, just discovered that we had them already ;-)

Thomas has just scripted up a new "detect if a commit is not in
linux-next yet" script that should avoid such problems in the future.

your second patch is still wanted, it would have detected the problem
earlier.

Ingo