public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>,
	ARM Linux Mailing List  <linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@hevs.ch>
Subject: mmc_test : some results
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:31:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48495843.1050902@atmel.com> (raw)

Hi Pierre,

Here are the results of a mmc_test run played on at91_mci after applying 
this patch series :
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/30/201

I skipped some of the tests just to concentrate on those ones.

Can you tell me if the test is correct : are the errors reported for the 
xfer_size tests the normal behavior (I assume yes because a failure is 
simulated) ?

~ # echo 1  > /sys/class/mmc_host/mmc0/mmc0\:e624/test
mmc0: Starting tests of card mmc0:e624...
mmc0: Test case 1. Basic write (no data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 2. Basic read (no data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 3. Basic write (with data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 4. Basic read (with data verification)...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 5. Multi-block write...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 6. Multi-block read...
mmc0: Result: OK
mmc0: Test case 7. Correct xfer_size at write (start failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-84)
mmc0: Test case 8. Correct xfer_size at read (start failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-110)
mmc0: Test case 9. Correct xfer_size at write (midway failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-84)
mmc0: Test case 10. Correct xfer_size at read (midway failure)...
mmc0: Result: ERROR (-110)
mmc0: Tests completed.
~ #

Thanks, regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre


             reply	other threads:[~2008-06-06 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-06 15:31 Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2008-06-09  0:21 ` mmc_test : some results Gururaja Hebbar K R
2008-06-09  7:54   ` Nicolas Ferre
2008-06-09 11:08 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-06-10  9:27   ` [PATCH] at91_mci: manage cmd error and data error independently Nicolas Ferre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48495843.1050902@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.pignat@hevs.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox