From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:52:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48495D4E.2070203@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080606152326.GA18359@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> AFAICS this is not yet required for v2.6.26, as the requirement to
>>>> never iterate to MAX_NUMNODES and call nr_cpus_node() with the
>>>> index only got introduced by Mike's patch.
>>> the one below is needed as well i think.
>> Yeah. I think you had better take Mike's patches, I don't trust even
>> that my patch and your fixlet does everything correctly.
>
> yep, just discovered that we had them already ;-)
>
> Thomas has just scripted up a new "detect if a commit is not in
> linux-next yet" script that should avoid such problems in the future.
>
> your second patch is still wanted, it would have detected the problem
> earlier.
>
> Ingo
Thanks, yes, I agree. However I would like to modify it slightly:
---
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Add check for node passed to node_to_cpumask
* When CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is set, the node passed to
node_to_cpumask and node_to_cpumask_ptr should be validated.
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
--- linux-2.6.tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ linux-2.6.tip/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -399,6 +399,10 @@ int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
return per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_node_map, cpu);
}
+
+/* empty cpumask */
+static cpumask_t cpu_mask_none;
+
/*
* Returns a pointer to the bitmask of CPUs on Node 'node'.
*/
@@ -411,6 +415,13 @@ cpumask_t *_node_to_cpumask_ptr(int node
dump_stack();
return &cpu_online_map;
}
+ if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+ "_node_to_cpumask_ptr(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%d)\n",
+ node, nr_node_ids);
+ dump_stack();
+ return &cpu_mask_none;
+ }
return &node_to_cpumask_map[node];
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_node_to_cpumask_ptr);
@@ -426,6 +437,13 @@ cpumask_t node_to_cpumask(int node)
dump_stack();
return cpu_online_map;
}
+ if (node >= nr_node_ids) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+ "node_to_cpumask(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%d)\n",
+ node, nr_node_ids);
+ dump_stack();
+ return cpu_mask_none;
+ }
return node_to_cpumask_map[node];
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_to_cpumask);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-06 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-05 7:52 linux-next: Tree for June 5 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-06 2:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 3:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 7:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 7:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 7:47 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 7:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-06 8:01 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 8:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-06 8:30 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 11:50 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-06-06 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 8:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-06 8:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 8:38 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 8:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 9:01 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 7:29 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 9:48 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 9:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 10:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 10:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-06 11:21 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-06 11:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 12:33 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-06 13:33 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 13:50 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-06 14:07 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-06 14:20 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 14:36 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-06 14:41 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 14:51 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 14:54 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 14:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 15:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 15:13 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-06-06 15:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 15:52 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-06-18 8:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 15:04 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 15:20 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 15:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 15:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 14:13 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 13:28 ` Mike Travis
2008-06-06 17:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-06 7:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-05 6:41 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48495D4E.2070203@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox