From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux with kvm-intel locks up VMplayer guest is started
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:09:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4857FDE3.8050602@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080617133234.GE2397@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> [2008-06-17 08:16]:
>
>> VMware is a binary kernel module that's out of kernel. KVM is not
>> misbehaving and the fact that VMware breaks when the KVM module is
>> loaded isn't our problem. If they submitted their code for
>> inclusion in mainline, we could possibly come up with solution for
>> arbitrating who is using VT.
>>
>
> I feared I'd get a response like this. But unless this is a known
> issue in VMware (which I don't think it is), you don't know whether
> it's not a bug in kvm-intel.
>
We know exactly what the problem is. KVM activates VT unconditionally.
There's no hardware mechanism to arbitrate access to VT. KVM is the
only thing in the Linux kernel that uses VT so we don't have a software
mechanism to arbitrate access to VT.
If the VMware code was upstream, then we could work together to make a
software arbitration mechanism. It's not, and worse yet, it's closed
source so there's no chance it will be. Even if someone wrote an
arbitration mechanism and got VMware to use it, it still shouldn't be
merged because KVM would be the only thing using that mechanism
upstream. I'm not interested in adding kernel infrastructure to support
external binary kernel modules.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-17 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-16 15:05 Linux with kvm-intel locks up VMplayer guest is started Martin Michlmayr
2008-06-16 15:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-17 12:39 ` Martin Michlmayr
2008-06-17 13:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-17 13:32 ` Martin Michlmayr
2008-06-17 13:44 ` Martin Michlmayr
2008-06-17 14:02 ` Javier Guerra
2008-06-17 15:29 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-17 18:09 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2008-06-18 13:56 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-18 20:59 ` Anthony Liguori
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-18 19:05 devzero
2008-06-18 19:52 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-19 1:08 ` Eli Collins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4857FDE3.8050602@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tbm@cyrius.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox