public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel K." <dk@uw.no>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	mingo@elte.hu,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RT-Scheduler/cgroups: Possible overuse of resources assigned via cpu.rt_period_us and cpu.rt_runtime_us
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:12:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <485917CF.1010401@uw.no> (raw)

mkdir /dev/cgroup
mount -t cgroup -o cpu,cpuset cgroup /dev/cgroup

mkdir /dev/cgroup/0

echo 3 > /dev/cgroup/0/cpuset.cpus
echo 0 > /dev/cgroup/0/cpuset.mems
echo 100000 > /dev/cgroup/0/cpu.rt_period_us
echo   5000 > /dev/cgroup/0/cpu.rt_runtime_us

schedtool -R -p 1 -e burnP6 &
[1] 3309
echo 3309 > /dev/cgroup/0/tasks

At this point I'd expect the burnP6 task to use 5% of the available CPU
resources in the cgroup (5000/100000), but the real CPU usage, as
reported by top, is 20% This is 4 times the expected result, and as I
have 4 cores, I think there is a strong hint of correlation there.

Maybe with a 4 core system there really is 4 000 000 us available for
every 1 wall-time second?

However, I have only assigned one core (3) to _this_ cgroup, so I think
this cgroup is overusing its assigned resources.

What do you think?


Daniel K.

             reply	other threads:[~2008-06-18 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-18 14:12 Daniel K. [this message]
2008-06-18 14:37 ` RT-Scheduler/cgroups: Possible overuse of resources assigned via cpu.rt_period_us and cpu.rt_runtime_us Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24  6:14   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-24  9:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-24 16:50       ` Max Krasnyanskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=485917CF.1010401@uw.no \
    --to=dk@uw.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox