From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: kerneloops.org: 2.6.26-rc possible regression in ext3
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:17:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485A6A69.8090402@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485A680B.3020004@linux.intel.com>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> In the kerneloops.org stats, a new oops is rapidly climbing the charts.
>>> The oops is a page fault in the ext3 "do_slit" function, and the first
>>> report of it was with 2.6.26-rc6-git3.
>>>
>>> It happens with various applications; the backtraces are at:
>>>
>>> http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=do_split
>> Arjan, I was just looking at kerneloops last night, seeing the count for
>> this oops climb, and was wishing there were some way to annotate an oops
>> signature with more info. If I could have tagged this with the RH
>> bugzilla nr. it might have saved a lot of time for folks. Is this
>> feasible? Or is finding the oops text in bugzilla the only way?
>>
>
> there's a way to add a description to oopses (you might have seen some of these
> descriptions already); however I've not implemented an account system yet so for
> now it's only me who can add these.
Ok, that was my guess. I'll shoot you an email next time. :)
Thanks,
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-19 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-19 5:36 kerneloops.org: 2.6.26-rc possible regression in ext3 Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-19 5:42 ` Dave Airlie
2008-06-19 5:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-19 6:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19 7:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-19 8:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-19 8:32 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-06-19 10:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-19 13:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-19 15:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-19 15:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-19 15:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-19 15:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-19 15:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-19 14:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-19 14:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-19 14:17 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-19 5:34 Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-19 6:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19 6:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-19 6:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-06-19 6:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-19 6:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-20 15:34 ` Bill Nottingham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485A6A69.8090402@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox