public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] aio: invalidate async directio writes
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:23:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <485A95FE.9080308@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49ej6uy5qo.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>


> +static DECLARE_WORK(aio_complete_work, aio_complete_fn, NULL);
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(iocb_completion_list_lock);
> +static LIST_HEAD(iocb_completion_list);

It seems like a bad idea to funnel all AIO DIO completion in the system
through one cacheline.  Should we have per-cpu lists and work structs?

> +			unsigned long flags;
> +			spin_lock_irqsave(&iocb_completion_list_lock, flags);
> +			list_add(&dio->done_list, &iocb_completion_list);
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iocb_completion_list_lock, flags);
> +			schedule_work(&aio_complete_work);

And we should probably use list_add_tail() here so that we don't reverse
 the order of IO completion and end_io() callbacks.

And hopefully going per-cpu could simplify the locking so that we don't
have even more per-io locking.

- z

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-19 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-18 18:09 [patch] aio: invalidate async directio writes Jeff Moyer
2008-06-18 18:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-18 19:45   ` Jeff Moyer
2008-06-18 19:48     ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-19  7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 13:50   ` Jeff Moyer
2008-06-19 13:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 14:05       ` Jeff Moyer
2008-06-19 17:50   ` Zach Brown
2008-06-19 17:23 ` Zach Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=485A95FE.9080308@oracle.com \
    --to=zach.brown@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox