public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Add support for IRQ_NOAUTOEN in __set_irq_handler
@ 2008-06-19 19:37 Esben Haabendal
  2008-06-20  8:19 ` Esben Haabendal
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Esben Haabendal @ 2008-06-19 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Any reason for __set_irq_handler not supporting the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag?

/Esben

 kernel/irq/chip.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index 964964b..42bb163 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -584,10 +584,15 @@ __set_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
irq_flow_handler_t handle, int is_chained,
 	desc->name = name;

 	if (handle != handle_bad_irq && is_chained) {
-		desc->status &= ~IRQ_DISABLED;
 		desc->status |= IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE;
-		desc->depth = 0;
-		desc->chip->unmask(irq);
+		if (!(desc->status & IRQ_NOAUTOEN)) {
+			desc->depth = 0;
+			desc->status &= ~IRQ_DISABLED;
+			desc->chip->unmask(irq);
+		} else {
+			/* Undo nested disables: */
+			desc->depth = 1;
+		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
 }

-- 
Esben Haabendal, Senior Software Consultant
DoréDevelopment ApS, Ved Stranden 1, 9560 Hadsund, DK-Denmark
Tlf: +45 51 92 53 93, mail: eha@doredevelopment.dk
WWW: http://www.doredevelopment.dk

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Add support for IRQ_NOAUTOEN in __set_irq_handler
  2008-06-19 19:37 [PATCH] Add support for IRQ_NOAUTOEN in __set_irq_handler Esben Haabendal
@ 2008-06-20  8:19 ` Esben Haabendal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Esben Haabendal @ 2008-06-20  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Currently, IRQ_NOAUTOEN is only supported with request_irq, and not fx.
set_irq_chained_handler(). As the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag is silently ignored by
__set_irq_handler, you risk writing faulty code that start with irq enabled
although the developer expects irq disabled.

If the flag is not handled, wouldn't it make sense to return an error?

/Esben

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Esben Haabendal <eha@doredevelopment.dk> wrote:
>
> Any reason for __set_irq_handler not supporting the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag?
>
> /Esben
>
>  kernel/irq/chip.c |   11 ++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> index 964964b..42bb163 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -584,10 +584,15 @@ __set_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
> irq_flow_handler_t handle, int is_chained,
>        desc->name = name;
>
>        if (handle != handle_bad_irq && is_chained) {
> -               desc->status &= ~IRQ_DISABLED;
>                desc->status |= IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE;
> -               desc->depth = 0;
> -               desc->chip->unmask(irq);
> +               if (!(desc->status & IRQ_NOAUTOEN)) {
> +                       desc->depth = 0;
> +                       desc->status &= ~IRQ_DISABLED;
> +                       desc->chip->unmask(irq);
> +               } else {
> +                       /* Undo nested disables: */
> +                       desc->depth = 1;
> +               }
>        }
>        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
>  }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-20  8:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-19 19:37 [PATCH] Add support for IRQ_NOAUTOEN in __set_irq_handler Esben Haabendal
2008-06-20  8:19 ` Esben Haabendal

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox