From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
systemtap-ml <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch 2/2] markers: example of irq regular kernel markers
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:34:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485C064E.5020705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080620174529.GB10943@Krystal>
Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Masami Hiramatsu (mhiramat@redhat.com) wrote:
>> Add trace points of irq handle events ported from LTTng's markers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> I just rewrote LTTng's irq event by using DEFINE_TRACE for example.
>>
>> include/linux/irq_trace.h | 6 ++++++
>> kernel/irq/handle.c | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: 2.6.26-rc5-mm3/include/linux/irq_trace.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
>> +++ 2.6.26-rc5-mm3/include/linux/irq_trace.h 2008-06-16 12:27:51.000000000 -0400
>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>> +#include <linux/marker.h>
>> +
>> +DEFINE_TRACE(irq_entry, (int irq_id, int kernel_mode), irq_id, kernel_mode);
>> +
>> +DEFINE_TRACE(irq_exit, (void));
>> +
>
> All this work look good, thanks Masami! Sorry I did not find time to do
> it lately, I've been busy on other things. A small question though :
> since LTTng is configurable both as an external module or as an
> in-kernel tracer, I wonder if it would really hurt to add the format
> strings to DEFINE_TRACE, e.g. :
>
> DEFINE_TRACE(name, prototype, format_string, args...)
>
> which would give :
>
> DEFINE_TRACE(irq_entry, (int irq_id, int kernel_mode), "%d %d",
> irq_id, kernel_mode);
>
> DEFINE_TRACE(irq_exit, (void), MARK_NOARGS);
>
> and calling this in the kernel code :
>
> trace_irq_entry(irq, (regs)?(!user_mode(regs)):(1));
> ...
> trace_irq_exit();
>
> and for quick-and-dirty debug usage, one would add this to kernel code :
>
> trace_mark(subsystem_event, "(int arg, struct task_struct *task)",
> "%d %p", arg, current);
why would you complicate it? I think.
trace_mark(subsystem_event, "arg %d task %p", arg, current);
is enough for user-defined markers.
>
> By doing so, we could leave a gcc format string check by passing the
> format string to __mark_check_format(). We could extract the field names
> from the prototype, so there is no need to duplicate field information
> in the format string.
I thought that someone complained against those format strings in
kernel code. Thus I removed it from DEFINE_TRACE.
even though, I think you can do that by adding below string table
to LTTng module.
const char *lookup_table[MAX_MARKERS][2] = {
{"irq_entry", "%d %d"}, // or "(int irq_id, int kernel_mode)", "%d %d"
...
};
>
> Since the format string information is hidden in a header but kept at
> the same location as the trace point definition, I think it reaches
> goals of being "neat", efficient for general purpose tracers and to keep
> the tracepoint information all in one place so we don't end up adding
> stuff to various information consumers whenever a new trace point is
> added.
Hmm, IMHO, there seems no difference between
DEFINE_TRACE(irq_entry, (int irq_id, int kernel_mode), "%d %d",
irq_id, kernel_mode);
and
trace_irq_entry(int irq_id, int kernel_mode)
{
trace_mark(irq_entry, "%d %d", irq_id, kernel_mode);
}
for me. If so, we'd better use latter because of simplicity:-)
Thank you,
>
> What do you think of these changes ?
>
> Mathieu
>
>
>> Index: 2.6.26-rc5-mm3/kernel/irq/handle.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- 2.6.26-rc5-mm3.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c 2008-06-16 12:27:50.000000000 -0400
>> +++ 2.6.26-rc5-mm3/kernel/irq/handle.c 2008-06-16 12:27:51.000000000 -0400
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>> #include <linux/random.h>
>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
>> +#include <linux/irq_trace.h>
>>
>> #include "internals.h"
>>
>> @@ -130,6 +131,9 @@ irqreturn_t handle_IRQ_event(unsigned in
>> {
>> irqreturn_t ret, retval = IRQ_NONE;
>> unsigned int status = 0;
>> + struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
>> +
>> + trace_irq_entry(irq, (regs)?(!user_mode(regs)):(1));
>>
>> handle_dynamic_tick(action);
>>
>> @@ -148,6 +152,8 @@ irqreturn_t handle_IRQ_event(unsigned in
>> add_interrupt_randomness(irq);
>> local_irq_disable();
>>
>> + trace_irq_exit();
>> +
>> return retval;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> Masami Hiramatsu
>>
>> Software Engineer
>> Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
>> Software Solutions Division
>>
>> e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
>>
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-20 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-20 17:03 [RFC][Patch 2/2] markers: example of irq regular kernel markers Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-20 17:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-20 19:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2008-06-21 10:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-21 14:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-06-21 14:53 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-21 15:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-06-21 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-21 18:02 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-22 4:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-23 2:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-21 19:39 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-22 4:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-20 20:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-22 17:11 ` [RFC] Tracepoint proposal Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-22 17:59 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-06-22 18:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-24 0:20 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-06-24 4:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-24 7:15 ` Takashi Nishiie
2008-06-24 11:55 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-24 16:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-24 16:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-24 17:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-24 17:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-25 23:52 ` [RFC PATCH] Kernel Tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-26 21:02 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-27 13:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-27 22:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-30 15:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-27 13:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-30 19:38 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-27 13:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-27 20:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-30 15:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-30 19:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-03 15:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-03 18:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-27 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH] Kernel Tracepoints (update) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-03 15:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-03 15:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-03 18:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-03 18:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-25 23:55 ` [RFC PATCH] Tracepoint sched probes Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-24 3:09 ` [RFC] Tracepoint proposal Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485C064E.5020705@redhat.com \
--to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=haoki@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox