public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	systemtap-ml <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
	Hideo AOKI <haoki@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch 2/2] markers: example of irq regular kernel markers
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:34:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <485C064E.5020705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080620174529.GB10943@Krystal>

Hi Mathieu,

Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Masami Hiramatsu (mhiramat@redhat.com) wrote:
>> Add trace points of irq handle events ported from LTTng's markers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> I just rewrote LTTng's irq event by using DEFINE_TRACE for example.
>>
>>  include/linux/irq_trace.h |    6 ++++++
>>  kernel/irq/handle.c       |    6 ++++++
>>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: 2.6.26-rc5-mm3/include/linux/irq_trace.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- /dev/null	1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
>> +++ 2.6.26-rc5-mm3/include/linux/irq_trace.h	2008-06-16 12:27:51.000000000 -0400
>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>> +#include <linux/marker.h>
>> +
>> +DEFINE_TRACE(irq_entry, (int irq_id, int kernel_mode), irq_id, kernel_mode);
>> +
>> +DEFINE_TRACE(irq_exit, (void));
>> +
> 
> All this work look good, thanks Masami! Sorry I did not find time to do
> it lately, I've been busy on other things. A small question though :
> since LTTng is configurable both as an external module or as an
> in-kernel tracer, I wonder if it would really hurt to add the format
> strings to DEFINE_TRACE, e.g. :
> 
> DEFINE_TRACE(name, prototype, format_string, args...)
> 
> which would give :
> 
> DEFINE_TRACE(irq_entry, (int irq_id, int kernel_mode), "%d %d",
>     irq_id, kernel_mode);
> 
> DEFINE_TRACE(irq_exit, (void), MARK_NOARGS);
> 
> and calling this in the kernel code :
> 
> trace_irq_entry(irq, (regs)?(!user_mode(regs)):(1));
> ...
> trace_irq_exit();
> 
> and for quick-and-dirty debug usage, one would add this to kernel code :
> 
> trace_mark(subsystem_event, "(int arg, struct task_struct *task)",
>  "%d %p", arg, current);

why would you complicate it? I think.

trace_mark(subsystem_event, "arg %d task %p", arg, current);

is enough for user-defined markers.

> 
> By doing so, we could leave a gcc format string check by passing the
> format string to __mark_check_format(). We could extract the field names
> from the prototype, so there is no need to duplicate field information
> in the format string.

I thought that someone complained against those format strings in
kernel code. Thus I removed it from DEFINE_TRACE.

even though, I think you can do that by adding below string table
to LTTng module.

const char *lookup_table[MAX_MARKERS][2] = {
{"irq_entry", "%d %d"}, // or "(int irq_id, int kernel_mode)", "%d %d"
...
};


> 
> Since the format string information is hidden in a header but kept at
> the same location as the trace point definition, I think it reaches
> goals of being "neat", efficient for general purpose tracers and to keep
> the tracepoint information all in one place so we don't end up adding
> stuff to various information consumers whenever a new trace point is
> added.

Hmm, IMHO, there seems no difference between

DEFINE_TRACE(irq_entry, (int irq_id, int kernel_mode), "%d %d",
     irq_id, kernel_mode);

and

trace_irq_entry(int irq_id, int kernel_mode)
{
	trace_mark(irq_entry, "%d %d", irq_id, kernel_mode);
}

for me. If so, we'd better use latter because of simplicity:-)

Thank you,


> 
> What do you think of these changes ?
> 
> Mathieu
> 
> 
>> Index: 2.6.26-rc5-mm3/kernel/irq/handle.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- 2.6.26-rc5-mm3.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c	2008-06-16 12:27:50.000000000 -0400
>> +++ 2.6.26-rc5-mm3/kernel/irq/handle.c	2008-06-16 12:27:51.000000000 -0400
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/random.h>
>>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>  #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
>> +#include <linux/irq_trace.h>
>>
>>  #include "internals.h"
>>
>> @@ -130,6 +131,9 @@ irqreturn_t handle_IRQ_event(unsigned in
>>  {
>>  	irqreturn_t ret, retval = IRQ_NONE;
>>  	unsigned int status = 0;
>> +	struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
>> +
>> +	trace_irq_entry(irq, (regs)?(!user_mode(regs)):(1));
>>
>>  	handle_dynamic_tick(action);
>>
>> @@ -148,6 +152,8 @@ irqreturn_t handle_IRQ_event(unsigned in
>>  		add_interrupt_randomness(irq);
>>  	local_irq_disable();
>>
>> +	trace_irq_exit();
>> +
>>  	return retval;
>>  }
>>
>> -- 
>> Masami Hiramatsu
>>
>> Software Engineer
>> Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
>> Software Solutions Division
>>
>> e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
>>
> 

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-20 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-20 17:03 [RFC][Patch 2/2] markers: example of irq regular kernel markers Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-20 17:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-20 19:34   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2008-06-21 10:12     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-21 14:36       ` Steven Rostedt
2008-06-21 14:53         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-21 15:07           ` Steven Rostedt
2008-06-21 16:13             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-21 18:02               ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-22  4:31                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-23  2:19                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-21 19:39             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-22  4:00       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-20 20:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-22 17:11     ` [RFC] Tracepoint proposal Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-22 17:59       ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-06-22 18:27         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-24  0:20           ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-06-24  4:01             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-24  7:15               ` Takashi Nishiie
2008-06-24 11:55                 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-06-24 16:04                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-24 16:21                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-24 17:01                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-24 17:46                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-25 23:52                       ` [RFC PATCH] Kernel Tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-26 21:02                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-27 13:14                           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-27 22:45                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-30 15:43                               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-27 13:15                           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-30 19:38                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-27 13:30                           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-27 20:58                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-30 15:40                               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-30 19:58                                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-03 15:12                                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-03 18:51                                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-27 13:36                           ` [RFC PATCH] Kernel Tracepoints (update) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-03 15:27                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-07-03 15:47                               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-03 18:18                               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-07-03 18:46                                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-06-25 23:55                       ` [RFC PATCH] Tracepoint sched probes Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-06-24  3:09       ` [RFC] Tracepoint proposal Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=485C064E.5020705@redhat.com \
    --to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=haoki@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox